Wood thrush has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have put the article on hold until the following issues are addressed:
Altogether, the article was interesting to read. There are some grammar issues, and some more inline citations are needed. Address the above issues within seven days and I'll pass the article. If you have any questions or when you are done, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 23:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I have passed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. Excellent work on addressing the above issues so quickly. Make sure the article maintains its high quality, ensuring that all new information is properly sourced. Maybe consider seeing if WP:Birds can help you get it to FA if you desire. If you have the time, consider reviewing an article or two at GAC to help with the large backlog. Good job, and I hope you continue to improve the quality of articles on Wikipedia! -- Nehrams2020 03:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
The territory size range given in the intro (para 30 and "behaviour" (para 1) differs from that given under "reproduction". Jimfbleak 07:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
I'll try to sort out any leftover singular/plural things before I leave on vacation, then. Thanks for pointing it out! Cheers, Corvus coronoides 19:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok then...looking promising:
Do not make a great effort copyediting. I may have some more ideas. after all this added (or unable ot be found) - then ensure lead summary of artcile and then copyedit. I will ask a friend if he has time :) cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 14:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
There's an article on Wood Thrush migration in this month's Science: "Tracking Long-Distance Songbird Migration by Using Geolocators" Kaldari ( talk) 21:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
It seems a bit odd that the vocal cords are not mentioned. The bird is notable for having two independently controllable sets, so being able to duet with itself. More detail here (audio) 6 mins). Could do with a mention, perhaps. Span ( talk) 18:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Wood thrush has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have put the article on hold until the following issues are addressed:
Altogether, the article was interesting to read. There are some grammar issues, and some more inline citations are needed. Address the above issues within seven days and I'll pass the article. If you have any questions or when you are done, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 23:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I have passed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. Excellent work on addressing the above issues so quickly. Make sure the article maintains its high quality, ensuring that all new information is properly sourced. Maybe consider seeing if WP:Birds can help you get it to FA if you desire. If you have the time, consider reviewing an article or two at GAC to help with the large backlog. Good job, and I hope you continue to improve the quality of articles on Wikipedia! -- Nehrams2020 03:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
The territory size range given in the intro (para 30 and "behaviour" (para 1) differs from that given under "reproduction". Jimfbleak 07:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
I'll try to sort out any leftover singular/plural things before I leave on vacation, then. Thanks for pointing it out! Cheers, Corvus coronoides 19:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok then...looking promising:
Do not make a great effort copyediting. I may have some more ideas. after all this added (or unable ot be found) - then ensure lead summary of artcile and then copyedit. I will ask a friend if he has time :) cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 14:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
There's an article on Wood Thrush migration in this month's Science: "Tracking Long-Distance Songbird Migration by Using Geolocators" Kaldari ( talk) 21:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
It seems a bit odd that the vocal cords are not mentioned. The bird is notable for having two independently controllable sets, so being able to duet with itself. More detail here (audio) 6 mins). Could do with a mention, perhaps. Span ( talk) 18:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)