From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 21 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Speedily closed - this is a redirect!! See WP:REDIRECT. ( non-admin closure) Red Slash 13:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC) reply



Wonders of the Ancient World Wonders of the ancient world – even less reason to uppercase than Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, but the same reasons apply: the mos says to avoid capitalization and some reputable sources don't capitalize this, so we shouldn't either, e.g. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/mar/10/jonathanglancey.international ; in addition, this is a concept, not a proper noun, and there are in fact many versions of this list; in addition, WP is full of such unnecessarily capitalized article titles that should all be acceptable as uncontroversial move requests and should all be treated as violations of our mos unless all cited reputable sources uppercase – Espoo ( talk) 11:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply

This is a contested technical request ( permalink).  Philg88 talk 12:48, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Note, this is a redirect to Seven Wonders of the Ancient World where a discussion is taking place on capitalization. If the discussion here is also to be held, then oppose per my comments on the Seven Wonders page. Randy Kryn 13:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. This title is a redirect, not an article. The proposed target title is also already a redirect, to the same article. Even if the capitalization were explicitly considered to be wrong, it still wouldn't make sense to "move" this. Egsan Bacon ( talk) 16:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • oppose/close this is just a redirect and the target of this request is also a redirect, both of which point to the same place, there's nothing to do here --- 65.94.43.89 ( talk) 04:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 21 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Speedily closed - this is a redirect!! See WP:REDIRECT. ( non-admin closure) Red Slash 13:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC) reply



Wonders of the Ancient World Wonders of the ancient world – even less reason to uppercase than Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, but the same reasons apply: the mos says to avoid capitalization and some reputable sources don't capitalize this, so we shouldn't either, e.g. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/mar/10/jonathanglancey.international ; in addition, this is a concept, not a proper noun, and there are in fact many versions of this list; in addition, WP is full of such unnecessarily capitalized article titles that should all be acceptable as uncontroversial move requests and should all be treated as violations of our mos unless all cited reputable sources uppercase – Espoo ( talk) 11:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply

This is a contested technical request ( permalink).  Philg88 talk 12:48, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Note, this is a redirect to Seven Wonders of the Ancient World where a discussion is taking place on capitalization. If the discussion here is also to be held, then oppose per my comments on the Seven Wonders page. Randy Kryn 13:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. This title is a redirect, not an article. The proposed target title is also already a redirect, to the same article. Even if the capitalization were explicitly considered to be wrong, it still wouldn't make sense to "move" this. Egsan Bacon ( talk) 16:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • oppose/close this is just a redirect and the target of this request is also a redirect, both of which point to the same place, there's nothing to do here --- 65.94.43.89 ( talk) 04:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook