This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Victoria / Politics Low‑importance Women in the Victorian Legislative Assembly is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Is there a reason why the periods only show the month of starting and ending, rather than the precise days? Same for Women in the Victorian Legislative Council. All the other articles on women in state parliaments show the days. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 22:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, it really should stay at the original version until it's been discussed properly, as it's been questioned.

And my main question is: why? What is the purpose of the change? The only beneficial thing I see is the count (which is wildly inaccurate at the moment - there need to be a lot of tied numbers), and that could easily be incorporated into the old table. I don't think this table needs to be (or should be) sortable either. Frickeg ( talk) 12:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC) reply

I've reverted for the reasons Frickeg mentions here - and my thoughts are the same. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 14:09, 19 December 2015 (UTC) reply

I redid the table format to make it a sort table. This enables the user to sort by date. Also, I did not have time to set up a duration column properly which would have enabled a sort by period in the house. Oh well. Enthusiast ( talk) 19:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The table is ... already sorted by date? I'm a bit confused by that. Frickeg ( talk) 23:20, 30 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The sortable lets the sort to be by name, by date, by date of end of term, and by duration. Check it out in a previous version. Enthusiast ( talk) 05:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC) reply

It, uh, doesn't do that in practice if you check your own work. Not that sorting by date of election or end of term end adds anything to what is there now. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 07:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Do with it what you wish. I'm done. Enthusiast ( talk) 07:11, 31 December 2015 (UTC) reply