![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2018 and 3 December 2018. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Purplecow77,
Bcarte21.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I did a news search on this after it was linked as 'see also' in the YesAllWomen article to find out more about it. It seems the RS are mostly criticizing this hashtag. Here's just a few, but there are lots more:
Seems WP:DUE would require us to report this. -- BoboMeowCat ( talk) 04:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
I notice the entire section "Parody campaign with cats" has been deleted with comment "did you seriously just add this?". Is this being deleted on grounds of I just don't like it. The parody campaign has been covered by lots of RS so should be included in accordance with WP:DUE. I also notice select content from the Daily Dot which supports one point of view was deleted while content that supports the opposing POV was maintained. Restoring deleted content to avoid WP:CHERRYPICK.-- BoboMeowCat ( talk) 14:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not the best reference to state that it wasn't started by men's rights activists as she writes frequently for A Voice for Men and spoke at their recent conference, as well as being their social media director (check her LinkedIn). Here is a source on this from her own mouth: [1] -- 94.175.85.144 ( talk) 11:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
As someone who has just come to this page, I don't see how this entry is unencyclopaedic or reads like an opinion piece. It looks quite balanced to me, since it includes lots of criticisms of this campaign. It is also thoroughly referenced. I don't personally see the need for the template at the head of the article. Cleisthenes2 ( talk) 23:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The more successful a feminist movement is in challenging the authority of male-dominated groups, the more these groups will organize a countermovement.
What is meant with "successful [...] in challenging the authority"? How is this measured? Ybllaw ( talk) 14:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2018 and 3 December 2018. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Purplecow77,
Bcarte21.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I did a news search on this after it was linked as 'see also' in the YesAllWomen article to find out more about it. It seems the RS are mostly criticizing this hashtag. Here's just a few, but there are lots more:
Seems WP:DUE would require us to report this. -- BoboMeowCat ( talk) 04:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
I notice the entire section "Parody campaign with cats" has been deleted with comment "did you seriously just add this?". Is this being deleted on grounds of I just don't like it. The parody campaign has been covered by lots of RS so should be included in accordance with WP:DUE. I also notice select content from the Daily Dot which supports one point of view was deleted while content that supports the opposing POV was maintained. Restoring deleted content to avoid WP:CHERRYPICK.-- BoboMeowCat ( talk) 14:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Maybe not the best reference to state that it wasn't started by men's rights activists as she writes frequently for A Voice for Men and spoke at their recent conference, as well as being their social media director (check her LinkedIn). Here is a source on this from her own mouth: [1] -- 94.175.85.144 ( talk) 11:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
As someone who has just come to this page, I don't see how this entry is unencyclopaedic or reads like an opinion piece. It looks quite balanced to me, since it includes lots of criticisms of this campaign. It is also thoroughly referenced. I don't personally see the need for the template at the head of the article. Cleisthenes2 ( talk) 23:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The more successful a feminist movement is in challenging the authority of male-dominated groups, the more these groups will organize a countermovement.
What is meant with "successful [...] in challenging the authority"? How is this measured? Ybllaw ( talk) 14:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)