This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article was created or improved during the
BLM/Anti-discrimination edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project from July to December 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please
assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
…reviewers critiqued that…
This is a very peculiar oriented review. The reviewers consider that private housework HAS something to do with value and that women’s work outside IS "undesirable". They are wrong as of the fact that Davis does not answer about value. Davis clearly says on p. 234 why the question of the reviewers does not make sense. I doubt the encyclopedic value of mentioning such overtly partisan review. There are lots of opinions on housework!
Dominique Meeùs (
talk) 17:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Partisan comments are fine in Wikipedia if attributed,
due weight, and contrasted with different partisanships. Race & Class is a peer-reviewed academic journal within the field of domain of the book, which is about as clear-cut as it gets. Typically both authors and critical reviewers will accuse each other of ignoring clearly presented counter-arguments in their writing, but it is
synthesis for us to say "X was wrong because the original text says Y". —
Bilorv (talk) 11:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article was created or improved during the
BLM/Anti-discrimination edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project from July to December 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please
assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
…reviewers critiqued that…
This is a very peculiar oriented review. The reviewers consider that private housework HAS something to do with value and that women’s work outside IS "undesirable". They are wrong as of the fact that Davis does not answer about value. Davis clearly says on p. 234 why the question of the reviewers does not make sense. I doubt the encyclopedic value of mentioning such overtly partisan review. There are lots of opinions on housework!
Dominique Meeùs (
talk) 17:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Partisan comments are fine in Wikipedia if attributed,
due weight, and contrasted with different partisanships. Race & Class is a peer-reviewed academic journal within the field of domain of the book, which is about as clear-cut as it gets. Typically both authors and critical reviewers will accuse each other of ignoring clearly presented counter-arguments in their writing, but it is
synthesis for us to say "X was wrong because the original text says Y". —
Bilorv (talk) 11:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)reply