![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Wolfwalkers. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Wolfwalkers at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have cleared out the talk page, which was being used as a forum to speculate about the movie and generally talk about it in ways that were not related to improving the Wikipedia article. Please be aware that adding similar content will result in it being removed. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 10:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
You didn’t archived the comments. CycoMa ( talk) 04:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Wolfwalkers Is Expected To Get a New Release Date On June 25 2021. 2600:1700:BFA1:B110:696C:6D9F:BA56:704A ( talk) 01:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey guest what, Wolfwalkers will arrive to Theatres on June 25th 2021. 2600:1012:B06C:6586:BC55:22A4:8A88:432B ( talk) 01:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
On June 25, 2021, get ready go back to the big screen, Check out the Wolfwalkers has to Delayed schedule to New Release on To return wolf packs on the big screen in, and see the film in theaters June 25, 2021 (United States)." on the website. I'm pretty sure they are the same person. nyxærös 11:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
What the heading ! Nonsense paragraph that should not be here. Besides, it is not referenced. (Krenakarore) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.112.6.78 ( talk) 20:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
I've protected the page so that only auto/confirmed accounts can edit. It's only for a week, as I don't want to keep IPs from posting, as we've had good editors on the live article. I just want to prevent the IP(s) that are making the NOTFORUM posts from continuing to use it as a forum. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 04:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I've protected the main page from the IP addresses that have been adding and re-adding hoax information about sequels and a franchise. I've also blocked the main account, but I fully expect them to continue trying to edit with IP addresses. I've enabled the ability for new and unregistered accounts to suggest edits, so hopefully that won't be too much of a barrier to the IPs who have been making helpful edits. I'm very sorry that I had to do this and wanted to hold out on doing this for as long as possible, but the vandal is very persistent. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 06:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Every review speaks openly about Wolfwalkers being the same to Princess Mononoke what the Seven Samurais were to Magnificent Seven. Thus, people will get the idea of censorship when visiting this WP article and realize there is no mention of Ghibli, Hayao Miyazaki or the Mononoke-hime anime. Anyhow, H.M. is such a J.S. Bach-like genius in animation that admitting being influenced by him isn't shameful in any way! 94.21.160.121 ( talk) 20:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Easy: source it. 95.90.129.96 ( talk) 09:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
I've re-upped the protection here for a year since it seems like an IP address tried to start up with the nonsense again once the protection ended. It was a single edit, but the attempt to add info about the nonexistent future sequel gives off the impression that they'll probably start up again if left unprotected. I'm not protecting the talk page, but I will warn that this is not a forum and that if similar not-forum and OR posts start up again, there's a major risk of it getting protected. I hate that this penalizes the IPs not making bad edits, but this vandal is very persistent. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 12:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Wolfwalker has won the 15th Kecskemét Animation Film Festival (2021)'s Best Animated Feature of European Competition Award (among 5 films) and the Audience Award too: [1] [2] [3] 84.236.79.236 ( talk) 17:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
References
It doesn't seem like a good idea to me for the article to refer to the "Lord Protector" character as "Oliver Cromwell". Clearly, the character is strongly informed by the historical figure - but the work never explicitly equates them. And as the setting isn't strictly historical, for the article to do so is OR, surely. A quick google yielded an Los Angeles Times article which describes the connection like so (emphasis mine):
The second quote is attributed to co-director Tomm Moore, and I doubt he'd have phrased it like that if he'd not meant to make a distinction. The motivation for this may or may not have to do with the incompatible deaths of the fictional and historical incarnations. Thoughts?
ETA: I don't have a problem with it being in Category:Cultural depictions of Oliver Cromwell, though.
- 2A02:560:428C:A300:E455:C41B:4FD6:A419 ( talk) 22:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
(see above for context) Kindly replace all occurrences of "Oliver Cromwell" and "Cromwell" with "the Lord Protector" (or plain "he" or whatever else seems most appropriate in each case).
- 2A02:560:428C:A300:44:3732:5BB:6818 ( talk) 05:50, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
I really don't see why this page is locked at all, but if you won't let me do it myself you might want a link to Robin Goodfellow, that's hardly a name we have never heard before.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.229.4 ( talk) 05:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
I hadn't kept up with the page, but it looks like this is still a target for vandalism and hoaxes. I'm giving this a permanent semi-protection at this point. It's been a couple of years now at this point. It stinks, since there were absolutely good IPs making edits, so to them I do apologize that they were impacted. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 17:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Wolfwalkers. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Wolfwalkers at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have cleared out the talk page, which was being used as a forum to speculate about the movie and generally talk about it in ways that were not related to improving the Wikipedia article. Please be aware that adding similar content will result in it being removed. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 10:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
You didn’t archived the comments. CycoMa ( talk) 04:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Wolfwalkers Is Expected To Get a New Release Date On June 25 2021. 2600:1700:BFA1:B110:696C:6D9F:BA56:704A ( talk) 01:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey guest what, Wolfwalkers will arrive to Theatres on June 25th 2021. 2600:1012:B06C:6586:BC55:22A4:8A88:432B ( talk) 01:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
On June 25, 2021, get ready go back to the big screen, Check out the Wolfwalkers has to Delayed schedule to New Release on To return wolf packs on the big screen in, and see the film in theaters June 25, 2021 (United States)." on the website. I'm pretty sure they are the same person. nyxærös 11:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
What the heading ! Nonsense paragraph that should not be here. Besides, it is not referenced. (Krenakarore) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.112.6.78 ( talk) 20:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
I've protected the page so that only auto/confirmed accounts can edit. It's only for a week, as I don't want to keep IPs from posting, as we've had good editors on the live article. I just want to prevent the IP(s) that are making the NOTFORUM posts from continuing to use it as a forum. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 04:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I've protected the main page from the IP addresses that have been adding and re-adding hoax information about sequels and a franchise. I've also blocked the main account, but I fully expect them to continue trying to edit with IP addresses. I've enabled the ability for new and unregistered accounts to suggest edits, so hopefully that won't be too much of a barrier to the IPs who have been making helpful edits. I'm very sorry that I had to do this and wanted to hold out on doing this for as long as possible, but the vandal is very persistent. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 06:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Every review speaks openly about Wolfwalkers being the same to Princess Mononoke what the Seven Samurais were to Magnificent Seven. Thus, people will get the idea of censorship when visiting this WP article and realize there is no mention of Ghibli, Hayao Miyazaki or the Mononoke-hime anime. Anyhow, H.M. is such a J.S. Bach-like genius in animation that admitting being influenced by him isn't shameful in any way! 94.21.160.121 ( talk) 20:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Easy: source it. 95.90.129.96 ( talk) 09:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
I've re-upped the protection here for a year since it seems like an IP address tried to start up with the nonsense again once the protection ended. It was a single edit, but the attempt to add info about the nonexistent future sequel gives off the impression that they'll probably start up again if left unprotected. I'm not protecting the talk page, but I will warn that this is not a forum and that if similar not-forum and OR posts start up again, there's a major risk of it getting protected. I hate that this penalizes the IPs not making bad edits, but this vandal is very persistent. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 12:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Wolfwalker has won the 15th Kecskemét Animation Film Festival (2021)'s Best Animated Feature of European Competition Award (among 5 films) and the Audience Award too: [1] [2] [3] 84.236.79.236 ( talk) 17:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
References
It doesn't seem like a good idea to me for the article to refer to the "Lord Protector" character as "Oliver Cromwell". Clearly, the character is strongly informed by the historical figure - but the work never explicitly equates them. And as the setting isn't strictly historical, for the article to do so is OR, surely. A quick google yielded an Los Angeles Times article which describes the connection like so (emphasis mine):
The second quote is attributed to co-director Tomm Moore, and I doubt he'd have phrased it like that if he'd not meant to make a distinction. The motivation for this may or may not have to do with the incompatible deaths of the fictional and historical incarnations. Thoughts?
ETA: I don't have a problem with it being in Category:Cultural depictions of Oliver Cromwell, though.
- 2A02:560:428C:A300:E455:C41B:4FD6:A419 ( talk) 22:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
(see above for context) Kindly replace all occurrences of "Oliver Cromwell" and "Cromwell" with "the Lord Protector" (or plain "he" or whatever else seems most appropriate in each case).
- 2A02:560:428C:A300:44:3732:5BB:6818 ( talk) 05:50, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
I really don't see why this page is locked at all, but if you won't let me do it myself you might want a link to Robin Goodfellow, that's hardly a name we have never heard before.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.229.4 ( talk) 05:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
I hadn't kept up with the page, but it looks like this is still a target for vandalism and hoaxes. I'm giving this a permanent semi-protection at this point. It's been a couple of years now at this point. It stinks, since there were absolutely good IPs making edits, so to them I do apologize that they were impacted. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 17:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)