This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Witch-hunts in India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Witch-hunts in India has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 21, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Witch-hunts in India appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 May 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Hello again @ Schnitzella,
I guess you didn’t know about the ‘did you know’ time limit when you created this article. You might like to nominate it as a good article, perhaps together with one of your Women in Red comrades as there is often a long wait. Chidgk1 ( talk) 06:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Chidgk1,
Thanks for taking an interest in the article and letting me know about the good article nomination system, this was very helpful. Schnitzella ( talk) 21:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 14:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
This article is on an interesting topic, is well-cited and generally well-written. I have very few comments to make.
Chiswick Chap Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Hopefully, I have addressed all of the issues raised here to your satisfaction. In response to your fourth point, I have now clarified that the "State Commission for Women" is The Uttarakhand State Commission for Women and is separate from the Action Aid Commission. Please let me know if you have any further suggestions. Schnitzella ( talk) 16:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
01:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Schnitzella ( talk). Nominated by BorgQueen ( talk) at 18:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Witch-hunts in India; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
BorgQueen: I see that the article was recognized as a GA on 21 April 2023 (see:
Talk:Witch-hunts in India/GA1) and is well-sourced, written in a
WP:NPOV. The same source as provided in this nomination is also used in the article. The hook is interesting and correct. Nominator BorgQueen also recently contributed to the improvement of the article before it received a GA status. Consequently, I see no flaws why this nomination could be rejected and I can only thank to BorgQueen, @
Schnitzella: and other related contributors for creating quality content. --
Pofka (
talk)
16:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Witch-hunts in India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Witch-hunts in India has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 21, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Witch-hunts in India appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 May 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Hello again @ Schnitzella,
I guess you didn’t know about the ‘did you know’ time limit when you created this article. You might like to nominate it as a good article, perhaps together with one of your Women in Red comrades as there is often a long wait. Chidgk1 ( talk) 06:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Chidgk1,
Thanks for taking an interest in the article and letting me know about the good article nomination system, this was very helpful. Schnitzella ( talk) 21:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 14:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
This article is on an interesting topic, is well-cited and generally well-written. I have very few comments to make.
Chiswick Chap Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Hopefully, I have addressed all of the issues raised here to your satisfaction. In response to your fourth point, I have now clarified that the "State Commission for Women" is The Uttarakhand State Commission for Women and is separate from the Action Aid Commission. Please let me know if you have any further suggestions. Schnitzella ( talk) 16:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
01:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Schnitzella ( talk). Nominated by BorgQueen ( talk) at 18:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Witch-hunts in India; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
BorgQueen: I see that the article was recognized as a GA on 21 April 2023 (see:
Talk:Witch-hunts in India/GA1) and is well-sourced, written in a
WP:NPOV. The same source as provided in this nomination is also used in the article. The hook is interesting and correct. Nominator BorgQueen also recently contributed to the improvement of the article before it received a GA status. Consequently, I see no flaws why this nomination could be rejected and I can only thank to BorgQueen, @
Schnitzella: and other related contributors for creating quality content. --
Pofka (
talk)
16:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)