This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Since we are well over 75k, with 40 sections on this page, I think it is time to start archiving those sections that have been inactive for the past several days. We could turn on ClueBot III for automated archival of threads more than, say, 72 hours old. Wilhelm Meis ( ☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved by Chaser ( talk · contribs). FWIW, I agree with his assessment of the consensus and I would also add that the consensus is for the lowercased "temple". Jenks24 ( talk) 07:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2012 Oak Creek shooting →
2012 Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting – The current name is misleading. Consensus is generally strong that it should be moved, but in question is where it should be moved to. The above appears to have the most consensus, but on a potentially high-profile article I want to make sure consensus is clear before a move happens. -
Jorgath (
talk) (
contribs) 22:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Since this article is currently linked form the main page, I've moved the article per the tentative consensus below. Note that I make no firm judgment as to the consensus regarding capitalization of "temple". Discussion may continue for the full seven days on that point (and the re-name in general, for that matter, although I think we're clear on everything but the capitalization at this point).-- Chaser ( talk) 03:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC) |
"Move." It should be renamed. The Sikh temple aspect is a crucial public identifier. --(User:Toughasbrads)
According the the page on Sikhism, there are no priests.
Priestly class: Sikhism does not have priests, they were abolished by Guru Gobind Singh (the 10th Guru of Sikhism).[51] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.189.153.9 ( talk) 16:10, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
"Sikhism does not have priests, which were abolished by Guru Gobind Singh. The Guru felt that they had become corrupt and full of ego. Sikhs only have custodians of the Guru Granth Sahib (granthi)..."
from http://www.sikhs.org/summary.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.189.153.9 ( talk) 17:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
The Hindu says that Temple founder Sadwant Singh Kaleka battled with the gunman with his Kirpan (short knife) which may have saved lives of women and children. Can this be verified from other sources and added to the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.112.231.107 ( talk) 11:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
With due respect to all, let's consider a religious leader in their "house of worship" leading anything. They're typically surrounded by worshipers. ESPECIALLY at a communal meal time. Now, consider a knife that can be worn around the neck being used against a strange gunman in that situation. Indeed, consider my foot long combat knife in that situation. One would most likely not reach the gunman in time to even give a scratch. Now, consider what an agent would say to give comfort to survivors. Not denigrating anything, just suggesting that lacking reliable sources that fail to contradict what happened and the laws of physics, one gives the matter due consideration with two grains of salt. Wzrd1 ( talk) 05:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. It appears that consensus has shown the current title to be sufficiently clear. A different title, such as Wisconsin Sikh temple massacre might have had success--clearly this was a massacre, and a terrible shooting that remains inexplicable. ( non-admin closure) Red Slash 02:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting →
Wisconsin Sikh Massacre – 7 people were killed (and others injured), contradicting the article which previously stated six people died. The title implies that the Sikh temple itself was shot, and that people didn't die. Other articles (ex. the listing of massacres on Wikipedia) clearly identify this as a massacre. I think the current title is trying to minimize the incident and should be changed.
209.153.242.10 (
talk) 04:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The Sikh temple shooting was the act of a person with a radical ideology asserting the racial superiority of Europeans. That man had a xenophobic attitude toward Indian people and took their lives because of that attitude. This is no shooting; this is terrorism. Wikipedia itself defines it as "the systematic use of terror, often violent, especially as a means of coercion." What part of that definition does not accurately describe what happened at the Sikh temple? Ibnsina786 ( talk) 01:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Change it to a shooting of people in a Church, by a black Muslim supremicist with a tattoo of the Iraqi invasion. Haha. Terrorism is applied eaisly to some things but not others. Yeah we don't know his motive officially, just like we didin't so many others, but if an ISIS member blew up a school well I could probably be safe in guessing it was motivated by extremist views of Islam. Just like a white supremicist, with a tattoo of the 9/11 attacks happens to attack brown skinned people with turbans, often mistaken for the radical muslim sects that did 9/11. Well lets just be honest, regardless of his motivation he went to a temple of people who weren't doing anything and shot at civilians. Women, Children, and men. Similar to some middle eastern children where the same thing happened. Regardless of wether it is a mass shooting or terrorist attack. It is the same in violence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.69.176.102 ( talk) 07:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Re this edit: if you look closely at the sourcing, what it says is that investigators were treating the attack as "a domestic terrorist-type incident" or similar wording, rather than saying "Wade Page was a terrorist". This runs into problems with WP:OR and WP:TERRORIST. The article already says "Oak Creek police chief John Edwards said his force treated the incident as a " domestic terrorism incident"". Page obviously had links to far right organizations, but as the police chief said, we will never know exactly what went on in his head. I put back the part about him being an army veteran because this is reliably sourced and relevant information. As for Category:United States Domestic Terrorists, this is a red link so there isn't a great deal of point in adding it.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
The image ( File:Wade michael page police handout.png) is used in the article's section about the perpetrator responsible for the shooting. This is not like other images of perpetrators getting deleted, right? When I was reading the article in the Show Preview page, I already understand that the perpetrator was part of the event. Also, I already understand the event without this non-free image by reading the whole article. I can grasp how disturbing the event was without the image of this person. Nevertheless, I suspect that some might disagree and say that the whole headshot appearance (i.e. the mugshot) effectively increases readers' understanding of the event well. But how? Pinging Medeis who uploaded the image. -- George Ho ( talk) 22:25, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
I read sources saying that FBI handed out the photo. But then this sources credits the police department of Oak Creek, Wisconsin... or maybe it was that of Oak Creek, Colorado. -- George Ho ( talk) 01:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Medeis and Ianmacm, I have taken the image to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 August 19. Let's comment there. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Update: the image is deleted (well, it was deleted but then undeleted but then re-deleted) per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 October 19#File:Wade michael page police handout.png. George Ho ( talk) 06:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
So, I don't know if the problem is with the size of my phone screen, but the text wrap isn't working correctly on my phone. The map size is a little too small for the infobox and this causes some the text below the map ("show map of") to be displayed on the left side of the map, and the rest of the text ("Wisconsin" and "show map of United States", "show both") . I tried fixing it but the preview doesn't work correctly in this case and I don't want to overwhelm someone's watchlist. TryKid ( talk) 19:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Elli ( talk | contribs) 19:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting →
Oak Creek gurdwara shooting – The current title is too vague and implies the shooting took place in a Sikh temple located somewhere in
Wisconsin. "Oak Creek" is more specific, plus it aligns with other articles about mass shootings at places of worship, e.g.
Charleston church shooting,
Christchurch mosque shootings,
Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, etc. As for
gurdwara, it's the official term used for Sikh temples, for those of you who don't know.
Love of Corey (
talk) 20:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC) —Relisting.
Elli (
talk |
contribs) 06:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Make the prepator section an article, And give details too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BruhOfficial ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Since we are well over 75k, with 40 sections on this page, I think it is time to start archiving those sections that have been inactive for the past several days. We could turn on ClueBot III for automated archival of threads more than, say, 72 hours old. Wilhelm Meis ( ☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved by Chaser ( talk · contribs). FWIW, I agree with his assessment of the consensus and I would also add that the consensus is for the lowercased "temple". Jenks24 ( talk) 07:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2012 Oak Creek shooting →
2012 Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting – The current name is misleading. Consensus is generally strong that it should be moved, but in question is where it should be moved to. The above appears to have the most consensus, but on a potentially high-profile article I want to make sure consensus is clear before a move happens. -
Jorgath (
talk) (
contribs) 22:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Since this article is currently linked form the main page, I've moved the article per the tentative consensus below. Note that I make no firm judgment as to the consensus regarding capitalization of "temple". Discussion may continue for the full seven days on that point (and the re-name in general, for that matter, although I think we're clear on everything but the capitalization at this point).-- Chaser ( talk) 03:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC) |
"Move." It should be renamed. The Sikh temple aspect is a crucial public identifier. --(User:Toughasbrads)
According the the page on Sikhism, there are no priests.
Priestly class: Sikhism does not have priests, they were abolished by Guru Gobind Singh (the 10th Guru of Sikhism).[51] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.189.153.9 ( talk) 16:10, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
"Sikhism does not have priests, which were abolished by Guru Gobind Singh. The Guru felt that they had become corrupt and full of ego. Sikhs only have custodians of the Guru Granth Sahib (granthi)..."
from http://www.sikhs.org/summary.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.189.153.9 ( talk) 17:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
The Hindu says that Temple founder Sadwant Singh Kaleka battled with the gunman with his Kirpan (short knife) which may have saved lives of women and children. Can this be verified from other sources and added to the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.112.231.107 ( talk) 11:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
With due respect to all, let's consider a religious leader in their "house of worship" leading anything. They're typically surrounded by worshipers. ESPECIALLY at a communal meal time. Now, consider a knife that can be worn around the neck being used against a strange gunman in that situation. Indeed, consider my foot long combat knife in that situation. One would most likely not reach the gunman in time to even give a scratch. Now, consider what an agent would say to give comfort to survivors. Not denigrating anything, just suggesting that lacking reliable sources that fail to contradict what happened and the laws of physics, one gives the matter due consideration with two grains of salt. Wzrd1 ( talk) 05:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. It appears that consensus has shown the current title to be sufficiently clear. A different title, such as Wisconsin Sikh temple massacre might have had success--clearly this was a massacre, and a terrible shooting that remains inexplicable. ( non-admin closure) Red Slash 02:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting →
Wisconsin Sikh Massacre – 7 people were killed (and others injured), contradicting the article which previously stated six people died. The title implies that the Sikh temple itself was shot, and that people didn't die. Other articles (ex. the listing of massacres on Wikipedia) clearly identify this as a massacre. I think the current title is trying to minimize the incident and should be changed.
209.153.242.10 (
talk) 04:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The Sikh temple shooting was the act of a person with a radical ideology asserting the racial superiority of Europeans. That man had a xenophobic attitude toward Indian people and took their lives because of that attitude. This is no shooting; this is terrorism. Wikipedia itself defines it as "the systematic use of terror, often violent, especially as a means of coercion." What part of that definition does not accurately describe what happened at the Sikh temple? Ibnsina786 ( talk) 01:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Change it to a shooting of people in a Church, by a black Muslim supremicist with a tattoo of the Iraqi invasion. Haha. Terrorism is applied eaisly to some things but not others. Yeah we don't know his motive officially, just like we didin't so many others, but if an ISIS member blew up a school well I could probably be safe in guessing it was motivated by extremist views of Islam. Just like a white supremicist, with a tattoo of the 9/11 attacks happens to attack brown skinned people with turbans, often mistaken for the radical muslim sects that did 9/11. Well lets just be honest, regardless of his motivation he went to a temple of people who weren't doing anything and shot at civilians. Women, Children, and men. Similar to some middle eastern children where the same thing happened. Regardless of wether it is a mass shooting or terrorist attack. It is the same in violence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.69.176.102 ( talk) 07:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Re this edit: if you look closely at the sourcing, what it says is that investigators were treating the attack as "a domestic terrorist-type incident" or similar wording, rather than saying "Wade Page was a terrorist". This runs into problems with WP:OR and WP:TERRORIST. The article already says "Oak Creek police chief John Edwards said his force treated the incident as a " domestic terrorism incident"". Page obviously had links to far right organizations, but as the police chief said, we will never know exactly what went on in his head. I put back the part about him being an army veteran because this is reliably sourced and relevant information. As for Category:United States Domestic Terrorists, this is a red link so there isn't a great deal of point in adding it.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
The image ( File:Wade michael page police handout.png) is used in the article's section about the perpetrator responsible for the shooting. This is not like other images of perpetrators getting deleted, right? When I was reading the article in the Show Preview page, I already understand that the perpetrator was part of the event. Also, I already understand the event without this non-free image by reading the whole article. I can grasp how disturbing the event was without the image of this person. Nevertheless, I suspect that some might disagree and say that the whole headshot appearance (i.e. the mugshot) effectively increases readers' understanding of the event well. But how? Pinging Medeis who uploaded the image. -- George Ho ( talk) 22:25, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
I read sources saying that FBI handed out the photo. But then this sources credits the police department of Oak Creek, Wisconsin... or maybe it was that of Oak Creek, Colorado. -- George Ho ( talk) 01:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Medeis and Ianmacm, I have taken the image to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 August 19. Let's comment there. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Update: the image is deleted (well, it was deleted but then undeleted but then re-deleted) per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 October 19#File:Wade michael page police handout.png. George Ho ( talk) 06:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
So, I don't know if the problem is with the size of my phone screen, but the text wrap isn't working correctly on my phone. The map size is a little too small for the infobox and this causes some the text below the map ("show map of") to be displayed on the left side of the map, and the rest of the text ("Wisconsin" and "show map of United States", "show both") . I tried fixing it but the preview doesn't work correctly in this case and I don't want to overwhelm someone's watchlist. TryKid ( talk) 19:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Elli ( talk | contribs) 19:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting →
Oak Creek gurdwara shooting – The current title is too vague and implies the shooting took place in a Sikh temple located somewhere in
Wisconsin. "Oak Creek" is more specific, plus it aligns with other articles about mass shootings at places of worship, e.g.
Charleston church shooting,
Christchurch mosque shootings,
Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, etc. As for
gurdwara, it's the official term used for Sikh temples, for those of you who don't know.
Love of Corey (
talk) 20:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC) —Relisting.
Elli (
talk |
contribs) 06:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Make the prepator section an article, And give details too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BruhOfficial ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)