This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Winnow (algorithm) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The tag was placed on 2007-10-29T16:33:23 by user Kallerdis, but the article is much improved since then. I think it does provide enough context. - Pgan002 ( talk) 18:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
The text specifies the update procedure as:
Step 2 moves weights to zero, and neither of the other steps changes any weight that is zero. Because of that, I fear that this will too easily migrate towards an all-zero weights vector.
So, either explain why that will not happen, or adjust the description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.36.235.3 ( talk) 11:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
…that allows it to perform much better when many dimensions are irrelevant (hence its name).
I don't get the reference. If it's not just me being dumb, it might be good for someone who knows to add a short explanation on how this property leads to the algorithm's name. 2A02:120B:2C61:19F0:BC77:22BD:D7D6:59E8 ( talk) 22:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Winnow (algorithm) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The tag was placed on 2007-10-29T16:33:23 by user Kallerdis, but the article is much improved since then. I think it does provide enough context. - Pgan002 ( talk) 18:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
The text specifies the update procedure as:
Step 2 moves weights to zero, and neither of the other steps changes any weight that is zero. Because of that, I fear that this will too easily migrate towards an all-zero weights vector.
So, either explain why that will not happen, or adjust the description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.36.235.3 ( talk) 11:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
…that allows it to perform much better when many dimensions are irrelevant (hence its name).
I don't get the reference. If it's not just me being dumb, it might be good for someone who knows to add a short explanation on how this property leads to the algorithm's name. 2A02:120B:2C61:19F0:BC77:22BD:D7D6:59E8 ( talk) 22:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)