This article was nominated for deletion on 11 October 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The competitors portion of the article seems to get problematic when discussing WindowBlinds VS. Style XP flame wars. -- Konfab user 06:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
This
struck me as a little POV, so I got rid of it. — Saric ( Talk) 18:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I have a concern about part of this article.
I was just discussing this article with some friends, and this paragraph strikes me as very POV, partcularly the second sentence. The move towards minimalism was driven by aesthetics, not limitations. Certainly people are welcome to their opinions as to how the style of groups such as 4imp evolved, but opinions don't belong in Wikipedia. It would be different if there was a reference to -- just an example -- Heylove remarking that her style was developed as a result of msstyle limitations, but as it is the paragraph is just speculation. I think a complete rewrite or removal is called for. -- 64.199.239.197 17:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Status
To be fair to the user community, it should be discussed here that WindowBlinds got a number of critics on known sites such as download.com or pcworld.com, especially about problems of stability or crashes during use and uninstalling, low compatibility with some software, and as open door to spyware when installing tierce source skins. ( Originbob 23:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC))
I was told by an IT technician windowblinds was spyware, maybe this should be present on the page Lawnmowers Rock! 01:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Aquaxp.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
The image Image:Stardockcompanylogo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 October 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The competitors portion of the article seems to get problematic when discussing WindowBlinds VS. Style XP flame wars. -- Konfab user 06:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
This
struck me as a little POV, so I got rid of it. — Saric ( Talk) 18:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I have a concern about part of this article.
I was just discussing this article with some friends, and this paragraph strikes me as very POV, partcularly the second sentence. The move towards minimalism was driven by aesthetics, not limitations. Certainly people are welcome to their opinions as to how the style of groups such as 4imp evolved, but opinions don't belong in Wikipedia. It would be different if there was a reference to -- just an example -- Heylove remarking that her style was developed as a result of msstyle limitations, but as it is the paragraph is just speculation. I think a complete rewrite or removal is called for. -- 64.199.239.197 17:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Status
To be fair to the user community, it should be discussed here that WindowBlinds got a number of critics on known sites such as download.com or pcworld.com, especially about problems of stability or crashes during use and uninstalling, low compatibility with some software, and as open door to spyware when installing tierce source skins. ( Originbob 23:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC))
I was told by an IT technician windowblinds was spyware, maybe this should be present on the page Lawnmowers Rock! 01:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Aquaxp.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
The image Image:Stardockcompanylogo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)