This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
I've added some info about how does the aero preview handles winamp, please fix me if i am wrong, but i've uploaded a screenshot to prove it Drk Guy ( talk) 22:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I cant anywhere to find what is the winamp browser what. Do you can to add some information about Winamp browser? I need to know, what is its layout engine (gecko, ie, opera?). Thank you very much and sorry for my bad english. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.176.197.249 ( talk) 21:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for vote: include pre 1.0 release info? Some time back, an anonymous deleted 2 paragraphs under the rubric "minor change", without discussing it here. I'm reverting it. Unfortunately, it orphaned an image which 3 people worked on, which was subsequently automatically deleted. -- Lexein ( talk) 11:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Winamp can be used as a fully functional RSS reader/ Aggregator, for articles and media. Surprised not to find any mention of that here.— IncidentFlux [ TalkBack | Contributions ] 14:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
The current version of Winamp (5.541) does not contain the demo phrase "Winamp. It really whips the llama's ass." Instead, it says "Winamp. It really whips the llama's animal baa sounds." Have sensitive souls complained, or has Winamp decided to censor itself? Is this notable enough for the article?-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
I wanted to make some updates to the Winamp page based on the latest version (5.551). Three areas that I'd like to update: explain what new features are in place the latest version, add some external links to official Winamp pages (e.g. link to the developer network), and discuss Online Services. Previously Winamp users/developers could customize/create Skins & Plugins. Now there's a thrid area... Online services. -- Mikethellama ( talk) 14:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
How can it have 33 million users before it first released? by Random user 76.100.137.240 ( talk) 21:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
This article has been decimated by someone who couldn't be bothered with citation needed. This person has removed wheat (including images) along with the chaff. I'll be reverting most, if not all, of the destruction. This means that many intermediate edits will be lost. Discuss here, please before I do this. -- Lexein ( talk) 17:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Only Unagi had a solid citation. Sad to say, the other assertions definitely need a secondary source. And the XMMS claim is just irrelevant to Winamp, because it's simply compatible with Winamp skins. No derivation performed. -- Lexein ( talk) 21:45, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Deletions without discussion or contribution will be reverted. Deletions are lazy and are considered "drive-by". Contributions, such as discussion, "citation needed", rewriting for accuracy, or finding & citing sources, are valid improvements. Discuss. -- Lexein ( talk) 12:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
If I challenge the material, then you are the one who must provide a source in order for it to remain. TN X Man 12:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)"The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. The source should be cited clearly and precisely, with page numbers where appropriate, and must clearly support the material as presented in the article."
We need to state that the Winamp does not truly list either the title or the filename in the Winamp playlist. The software insists on displaying the artist name at least once before it displays the song. This does not allow one to sort so that the same song by more than one artist is displayed one after the other. Seems that one has to make a no win choice: Winamp which will display the time that a playlist will require to play; and the current version of Windows Media Player which truly displays the song name and will truly sort by song name but refuses to display the time that the playlist will require to play. 1archie99 ( talk) 01:52, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I now know how that blank occurred in my prior save: Firefox restarted in the middle of my section edit due to a toolbar install. I subsequently saved my (browser-retained) section edit, which became a full page save. Gotta watch that. -- Lexein ( talk) 04:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
I've added some info about how does the aero preview handles winamp, please fix me if i am wrong, but i've uploaded a screenshot to prove it Drk Guy ( talk) 22:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I cant anywhere to find what is the winamp browser what. Do you can to add some information about Winamp browser? I need to know, what is its layout engine (gecko, ie, opera?). Thank you very much and sorry for my bad english. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.176.197.249 ( talk) 21:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for vote: include pre 1.0 release info? Some time back, an anonymous deleted 2 paragraphs under the rubric "minor change", without discussing it here. I'm reverting it. Unfortunately, it orphaned an image which 3 people worked on, which was subsequently automatically deleted. -- Lexein ( talk) 11:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Winamp can be used as a fully functional RSS reader/ Aggregator, for articles and media. Surprised not to find any mention of that here.— IncidentFlux [ TalkBack | Contributions ] 14:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
The current version of Winamp (5.541) does not contain the demo phrase "Winamp. It really whips the llama's ass." Instead, it says "Winamp. It really whips the llama's animal baa sounds." Have sensitive souls complained, or has Winamp decided to censor itself? Is this notable enough for the article?-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
I wanted to make some updates to the Winamp page based on the latest version (5.551). Three areas that I'd like to update: explain what new features are in place the latest version, add some external links to official Winamp pages (e.g. link to the developer network), and discuss Online Services. Previously Winamp users/developers could customize/create Skins & Plugins. Now there's a thrid area... Online services. -- Mikethellama ( talk) 14:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
How can it have 33 million users before it first released? by Random user 76.100.137.240 ( talk) 21:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
This article has been decimated by someone who couldn't be bothered with citation needed. This person has removed wheat (including images) along with the chaff. I'll be reverting most, if not all, of the destruction. This means that many intermediate edits will be lost. Discuss here, please before I do this. -- Lexein ( talk) 17:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Only Unagi had a solid citation. Sad to say, the other assertions definitely need a secondary source. And the XMMS claim is just irrelevant to Winamp, because it's simply compatible with Winamp skins. No derivation performed. -- Lexein ( talk) 21:45, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Deletions without discussion or contribution will be reverted. Deletions are lazy and are considered "drive-by". Contributions, such as discussion, "citation needed", rewriting for accuracy, or finding & citing sources, are valid improvements. Discuss. -- Lexein ( talk) 12:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
If I challenge the material, then you are the one who must provide a source in order for it to remain. TN X Man 12:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)"The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. The source should be cited clearly and precisely, with page numbers where appropriate, and must clearly support the material as presented in the article."
We need to state that the Winamp does not truly list either the title or the filename in the Winamp playlist. The software insists on displaying the artist name at least once before it displays the song. This does not allow one to sort so that the same song by more than one artist is displayed one after the other. Seems that one has to make a no win choice: Winamp which will display the time that a playlist will require to play; and the current version of Windows Media Player which truly displays the song name and will truly sort by song name but refuses to display the time that the playlist will require to play. 1archie99 ( talk) 01:52, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I now know how that blank occurred in my prior save: Firefox restarted in the middle of my section edit due to a toolbar install. I subsequently saved my (browser-retained) section edit, which became a full page save. Gotta watch that. -- Lexein ( talk) 04:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)