This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Wimbledon Championships article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Wimbledon Championships was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily page views
|
On 3 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Wimbledon. The result of the discussion was No consensus for the disambiguation page, but the tournament moved to Wimbledon Championships instead. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Moved to Men's/Women's singles/doubles titles. After much-extended time for discussion, there is a clear consensus to move to Men's/Women's titles. Consensus to move to lowercase singles/doubles is narrower, but there is a consensus and it is firmly grounded in policy. BD2412 T 05:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
– Consistency with all Wimbledon draws post-1903, and all other tennis draws, which use "Men's"/"Women's". Sod25 ( talk) 08:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 06:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Wimbledon which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 20:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
In the Schedule section, the abolition of the traditional Sunday rest day as of 2022 is explained, and it is implied that the objective is to avoid a Manic Monday on which 32 players played each year prior to 2022.
If I have understood this correctly, then this following sentence should be in the past tense:
Before 2022, the second Monday at Wimbledon was often called "Manic Monday", because it is the busiest day with the last-16 matches for both men's and women's singles, where fans have a pick of watching on a single day, any of the best 32 players left; which is also unique in a Grand Slam singles competition.
like so:
Before 2022, the second Monday at Wimbledon was often called "Manic Monday", because it was the busiest day with the last-16 matches for both men's and women's singles, where fans had a pick of watching on a single day, any of the best 32 players left; which was also unique in a Grand Slam singles competition.
Could someone please confirm that I am right? Thank you. 2A00:23C6:549D:C301:8403:BDEF:CF98:57DB ( talk) 05:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SW19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Vpab15 ( talk) 18:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
The current revision in the section Records § Miscellaneous lists Markéta Vondroušová among unseeded champions with the comment "ranked 42nd". At the same time, Venus Williams is listed as the "lowest-ranked winner" with the comment "31st (23rd seed)". Shouldn't Vondroušová be the lowest-ranked winner? Kompik ( talk) 09:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Wimbledon Championships article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Wimbledon Championships was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily page views
|
On 3 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Wimbledon. The result of the discussion was No consensus for the disambiguation page, but the tournament moved to Wimbledon Championships instead. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Moved to Men's/Women's singles/doubles titles. After much-extended time for discussion, there is a clear consensus to move to Men's/Women's titles. Consensus to move to lowercase singles/doubles is narrower, but there is a consensus and it is firmly grounded in policy. BD2412 T 05:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
– Consistency with all Wimbledon draws post-1903, and all other tennis draws, which use "Men's"/"Women's". Sod25 ( talk) 08:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 06:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Wimbledon which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 20:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
In the Schedule section, the abolition of the traditional Sunday rest day as of 2022 is explained, and it is implied that the objective is to avoid a Manic Monday on which 32 players played each year prior to 2022.
If I have understood this correctly, then this following sentence should be in the past tense:
Before 2022, the second Monday at Wimbledon was often called "Manic Monday", because it is the busiest day with the last-16 matches for both men's and women's singles, where fans have a pick of watching on a single day, any of the best 32 players left; which is also unique in a Grand Slam singles competition.
like so:
Before 2022, the second Monday at Wimbledon was often called "Manic Monday", because it was the busiest day with the last-16 matches for both men's and women's singles, where fans had a pick of watching on a single day, any of the best 32 players left; which was also unique in a Grand Slam singles competition.
Could someone please confirm that I am right? Thank you. 2A00:23C6:549D:C301:8403:BDEF:CF98:57DB ( talk) 05:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SW19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Vpab15 ( talk) 18:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
The current revision in the section Records § Miscellaneous lists Markéta Vondroušová among unseeded champions with the comment "ranked 42nd". At the same time, Venus Williams is listed as the "lowest-ranked winner" with the comment "31st (23rd seed)". Shouldn't Vondroušová be the lowest-ranked winner? Kompik ( talk) 09:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)