This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"This worked because the negative halo around the second dot would will in the positive center of the first dot" - did the author mean "fill" or "well" ?
I seriously doubt Tom Kilburn wrote a 17-line program to calculate the highest factor of 218. Anyone who had access to that computer would probably have known that to be 2.
218 + 1 and 218 - 1 are more likely candidates, with 218 - 1 a bit more likely even though it equals (29 + 1)(29 - 1). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.157.34.130 ( talk) 21:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Any idea how much these things cost? Gah4 ( talk) 23:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
This article indicates that Williams tube was the first random access digital memory... However the dates of development and the dates of the patents in the article are LATER than the development and patent dates on Wikipedia's "core memory" article. By the dates in the articles alone, one would assume the claim that Williams tubes came "first". This claim of being first might be true, but I feel it needs a bit more explanation in order that the articles don't contradict each other. 216.164.226.167 ( talk) 13:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"This worked because the negative halo around the second dot would will in the positive center of the first dot" - did the author mean "fill" or "well" ?
I seriously doubt Tom Kilburn wrote a 17-line program to calculate the highest factor of 218. Anyone who had access to that computer would probably have known that to be 2.
218 + 1 and 218 - 1 are more likely candidates, with 218 - 1 a bit more likely even though it equals (29 + 1)(29 - 1). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.157.34.130 ( talk) 21:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Any idea how much these things cost? Gah4 ( talk) 23:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
This article indicates that Williams tube was the first random access digital memory... However the dates of development and the dates of the patents in the article are LATER than the development and patent dates on Wikipedia's "core memory" article. By the dates in the articles alone, one would assume the claim that Williams tubes came "first". This claim of being first might be true, but I feel it needs a bit more explanation in order that the articles don't contradict each other. 216.164.226.167 ( talk) 13:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)