GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Chip123456 ( talk · contribs) 19:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
The article is well written. It is sourced, however there are a few long paragraphs which only have one reference. To give the article best reliability we need to have more references for the longer paragraphs and break them up more. I will but the article on hold for around a week for these problems to be rectified. --
Chip123456 (
talk)
19:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Also other comments are welcome. Please feel to leave comments on how to improve this page. --
Chip123456 (
talk)
19:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Well, I'm afraid you will. I reviewed previous articles and passed them, not just because of their high standard but because of the number of references which backed them. The article will remain on hold for 6 more days. -- Chip123456 ( talk) 09:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
The article is written very well indeed. As pointed out, and as I very well know it is not KEY CRITERIA for the article to be awarded GA status but as I said I want this article to be the best. Also please note, I had every intention of passing the article anyway, as it is an excellent article, but I just wanted to increase to number of references to cover the vast paragraph area. I do have to admit that it was somewhat picky of me. Also sorry for the offence caused with the TB templates Ealdgyth. I will pass the article now. -- Chip123456 ( talk) 15:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Chip123456 ( talk · contribs) 19:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
The article is well written. It is sourced, however there are a few long paragraphs which only have one reference. To give the article best reliability we need to have more references for the longer paragraphs and break them up more. I will but the article on hold for around a week for these problems to be rectified. --
Chip123456 (
talk)
19:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Also other comments are welcome. Please feel to leave comments on how to improve this page. --
Chip123456 (
talk)
19:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Well, I'm afraid you will. I reviewed previous articles and passed them, not just because of their high standard but because of the number of references which backed them. The article will remain on hold for 6 more days. -- Chip123456 ( talk) 09:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
The article is written very well indeed. As pointed out, and as I very well know it is not KEY CRITERIA for the article to be awarded GA status but as I said I want this article to be the best. Also please note, I had every intention of passing the article anyway, as it is an excellent article, but I just wanted to increase to number of references to cover the vast paragraph area. I do have to admit that it was somewhat picky of me. Also sorry for the offence caused with the TB templates Ealdgyth. I will pass the article now. -- Chip123456 ( talk) 15:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)