This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
William Winstanley Hull article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | William Winstanley Hull has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 4, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from William Winstanley Hull appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 February 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 20:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Created by Pbritti ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/William Winstanley Hull; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sawyer-mcdonell ( talk · contribs) 19:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Well-written
Verifiable with no original research
Broad in its coverage
In certain respects a high tory and ultra-protestant, Hull joined Sir Robert Inglis's committee formed in 1829 to oppose the return of Robert Peel as MP for Oxford University, and a pamphlet he wrote in 1829 opposed the admission of Roman Catholics or Jews to parliament.(from the Oxford National Biography) - I think this could be a good thing to add; it gives more context to his views on liturgy, and it's an interesting contrast with his later defense of William George Ward. I think note 3 could be moved to the body of the text.
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
Passed
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute
Passed
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
William Winstanley Hull article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | William Winstanley Hull has been listed as one of the
Philosophy and religion good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 4, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from William Winstanley Hull appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 February 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 20:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Created by Pbritti ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/William Winstanley Hull; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sawyer-mcdonell ( talk · contribs) 19:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Well-written
Verifiable with no original research
Broad in its coverage
In certain respects a high tory and ultra-protestant, Hull joined Sir Robert Inglis's committee formed in 1829 to oppose the return of Robert Peel as MP for Oxford University, and a pamphlet he wrote in 1829 opposed the admission of Roman Catholics or Jews to parliament.(from the Oxford National Biography) - I think this could be a good thing to add; it gives more context to his views on liturgy, and it's an interesting contrast with his later defense of William George Ward. I think note 3 could be moved to the body of the text.
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
Passed
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute
Passed
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio