This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The majority of voters on the talk page were in favour of keeping the article, yet it was merged. The article clearly demonstrates the subjects importance and notablility. The Victoria Cross is very important in the UK and this may not be obvious to American users. Lummis's research into it was historically very important and therefore notable. The article should be restored. The majority consensus was to keep Jack1956 21:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Who exactly decided to merge this article? Unknown Unknowns 07:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The article stands on its own and does not need to be merged. There were far more in favour of keeping it than deleting Jack1956 09:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Whether an article is to be deleted or not is not for an individual administrator to decide. This article should not even have been nominated for deletion in the first place. Unknown Unknowns 08:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi everyone - I've had a look at this, and you really need to abide by the decision of the AfD (and hence consensus) and allow the article to be merged. This process is now in progress, but you are, of course, welcome to contest the closure of the AFD at WP:DRV. The changes to the article should not, however, be reverted until such a result is decided on DRV. As an aside - ArbCom wouldn't even consider taking this case, and threatening a case does no one any good. Mart inp23 19:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty of pulling the article around a bit. It may now contain typos. I see the merge tag has gone. ← ROGER → TALK 13:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The majority of voters on the talk page were in favour of keeping the article, yet it was merged. The article clearly demonstrates the subjects importance and notablility. The Victoria Cross is very important in the UK and this may not be obvious to American users. Lummis's research into it was historically very important and therefore notable. The article should be restored. The majority consensus was to keep Jack1956 21:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Who exactly decided to merge this article? Unknown Unknowns 07:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The article stands on its own and does not need to be merged. There were far more in favour of keeping it than deleting Jack1956 09:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Whether an article is to be deleted or not is not for an individual administrator to decide. This article should not even have been nominated for deletion in the first place. Unknown Unknowns 08:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi everyone - I've had a look at this, and you really need to abide by the decision of the AfD (and hence consensus) and allow the article to be merged. This process is now in progress, but you are, of course, welcome to contest the closure of the AFD at WP:DRV. The changes to the article should not, however, be reverted until such a result is decided on DRV. As an aside - ArbCom wouldn't even consider taking this case, and threatening a case does no one any good. Mart inp23 19:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty of pulling the article around a bit. It may now contain typos. I see the merge tag has gone. ← ROGER → TALK 13:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)