This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
William Faulkner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot ( talk) 13:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
The lead for this article says very little about its subject, William Faulkner, yet goes on at some length about other writers who aren't Faulkner — most of whom, quite honestly, are not the equal of Faulkner. Isn't the lead supposed to encapsulate the article to follow and compel me to read on in the article? This lead justs encourages me to link away to some other writers, probably not as good. Anyone else bothered about this? — HarringtonSmith ( talk) 17:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
It seems to me that the organization of the biography could use some improvement and more detail. Perhaps different sections for different phases of Faulkner's life as opposed to how it's currently organized? Maybe "Life in California" could be kept if citations can be found for it, but I think it might be better to get rid of the "Personal Life" section and work that information into a more chronologically organized biography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crecio ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
I've noticed that many writer pages have a list of writers that they've influenced in addition to the list of their influences. Is there any reason the Faulkner page doesn't have a list of writers he has influenced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.206.204.118 ( talk) 21:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
I would not say that Rowan Oak is maintained much as it was in Faulkner's life: it's now heavily air conditioned, and therefore completely different from when he lived there. Paulhummerman ( talk) 23:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Unlike many of the others, though, Faulkner liked to drink while he was writing. In 1937 his French translator, Maurice Edgar Coindreau, was trying to decipher one of Faulkner’s idiosyncratically baroque sentences. He showed the passage to the writer, who puzzled over it for a moment and then broke out laughing. “I have absolutely no idea of what I meant,” Faulkner told Coindreau. “You see, I usually write at night. I always keep my whiskey within reach; so many ideas that I can’t remember in the morning pop into my head.” http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/drinking_with_william_faulkner.html 193.40.6.118 ( talk) 18:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I have deleted the subsection 1.2 Death as it was redundant; information, in greater detail, already existed in subsection 1.1 Personal life. The split structure of section 1 Biography and subsection 1.1 Personal life, given the overall state of the article, has no justification. The flow is better with the two parts melded. - Neonorange ( talk) 19:52, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
There is a mistake on his wife's death. In the right side bar it says she died in 1962, the same year as Faulkner. In the article itself, it says she died in 1972 which is much more likely as she was considerably younger than Faulkner. 69.206.161.80 ( talk) 22:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC) Jon Mundy, Ph.D.
Sorry, I didn't know how to sign my comment when I posted it.^^^^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by David A. Phipps ( talk • contribs) 19:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
William Faulkner's father is addressed in this entry with both the name he was born with (Falkner) and the one the subject later adopted (Faulkner).
Mother and siblings are addressed "Faulkner".
Someone with access to the actual surnames ought to clean this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsusky ( talk • contribs) 19:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
The section about Faulkner in Toronto seems to indicate, from the way is written, that Faulkner was never really a member of the British Air Force. It is well documented that Faulkner was a cadet at the "School of Military Aeronautics" at the University of Toronto in 1918. I'd appreciate your comments. See: [1] [2]
References
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Carl Van Vechten - William Faulkner.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 25, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-09-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
The Modern Library rankings are for its imprints, not for novels in general. See Talk:Ulysses (novel)#Modern_Library rankings. Given that, consideration should be given to removing the those rankings from the lede, and if used in the text, they should be appropriately qualified. Kablammo ( talk) 18:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Looking for W. Faulkner navel with Joe Christmas as character. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.212.176 ( talk) 02:57, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
I just wanted to point out the conflicting information in this paragraph—hoping someone else can provide more insight? "Faulkner attempted to join the US Army, but was rejected for being under weight and his short stature of 5'5".…. Accounts of Faulkner being rejected from the United States Army Air Service due to his short stature, despite wide publication, are false." 74.129.65.242 ( talk) 02:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
William Faulkner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot ( talk) 13:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
The lead for this article says very little about its subject, William Faulkner, yet goes on at some length about other writers who aren't Faulkner — most of whom, quite honestly, are not the equal of Faulkner. Isn't the lead supposed to encapsulate the article to follow and compel me to read on in the article? This lead justs encourages me to link away to some other writers, probably not as good. Anyone else bothered about this? — HarringtonSmith ( talk) 17:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
It seems to me that the organization of the biography could use some improvement and more detail. Perhaps different sections for different phases of Faulkner's life as opposed to how it's currently organized? Maybe "Life in California" could be kept if citations can be found for it, but I think it might be better to get rid of the "Personal Life" section and work that information into a more chronologically organized biography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crecio ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
I've noticed that many writer pages have a list of writers that they've influenced in addition to the list of their influences. Is there any reason the Faulkner page doesn't have a list of writers he has influenced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.206.204.118 ( talk) 21:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
I would not say that Rowan Oak is maintained much as it was in Faulkner's life: it's now heavily air conditioned, and therefore completely different from when he lived there. Paulhummerman ( talk) 23:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Unlike many of the others, though, Faulkner liked to drink while he was writing. In 1937 his French translator, Maurice Edgar Coindreau, was trying to decipher one of Faulkner’s idiosyncratically baroque sentences. He showed the passage to the writer, who puzzled over it for a moment and then broke out laughing. “I have absolutely no idea of what I meant,” Faulkner told Coindreau. “You see, I usually write at night. I always keep my whiskey within reach; so many ideas that I can’t remember in the morning pop into my head.” http://www.openculture.com/2011/12/drinking_with_william_faulkner.html 193.40.6.118 ( talk) 18:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I have deleted the subsection 1.2 Death as it was redundant; information, in greater detail, already existed in subsection 1.1 Personal life. The split structure of section 1 Biography and subsection 1.1 Personal life, given the overall state of the article, has no justification. The flow is better with the two parts melded. - Neonorange ( talk) 19:52, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
There is a mistake on his wife's death. In the right side bar it says she died in 1962, the same year as Faulkner. In the article itself, it says she died in 1972 which is much more likely as she was considerably younger than Faulkner. 69.206.161.80 ( talk) 22:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC) Jon Mundy, Ph.D.
Sorry, I didn't know how to sign my comment when I posted it.^^^^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by David A. Phipps ( talk • contribs) 19:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
William Faulkner's father is addressed in this entry with both the name he was born with (Falkner) and the one the subject later adopted (Faulkner).
Mother and siblings are addressed "Faulkner".
Someone with access to the actual surnames ought to clean this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsusky ( talk • contribs) 19:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
The section about Faulkner in Toronto seems to indicate, from the way is written, that Faulkner was never really a member of the British Air Force. It is well documented that Faulkner was a cadet at the "School of Military Aeronautics" at the University of Toronto in 1918. I'd appreciate your comments. See: [1] [2]
References
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Carl Van Vechten - William Faulkner.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 25, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-09-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
The Modern Library rankings are for its imprints, not for novels in general. See Talk:Ulysses (novel)#Modern_Library rankings. Given that, consideration should be given to removing the those rankings from the lede, and if used in the text, they should be appropriately qualified. Kablammo ( talk) 18:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Looking for W. Faulkner navel with Joe Christmas as character. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.212.176 ( talk) 02:57, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
I just wanted to point out the conflicting information in this paragraph—hoping someone else can provide more insight? "Faulkner attempted to join the US Army, but was rejected for being under weight and his short stature of 5'5".…. Accounts of Faulkner being rejected from the United States Army Air Service due to his short stature, despite wide publication, are false." 74.129.65.242 ( talk) 02:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)