![]() | William C. Young has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 28, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from William C. Young appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 May 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk)
19:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Created by PCN02WPS ( talk). Self-nominated at 07:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 19:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
19:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Images are appropriately tagged. Sources include an MA thesis, but it's used for an uncontroversial statement and I think is OK; the other sources are reliable. The article is in good shape; I've copyedited a little (please revert if I screwed anything up) and have nothing left over to complain about, so I'm passing this. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 20:14, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
PCN02WPS, I should have done spotchecks when I did the GA review, so I'm doing them now. I came up with one thing I wanted to query:
The other spotchecks I made were all fine. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 10:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | William C. Young has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 28, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from William C. Young appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 May 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk)
19:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Created by PCN02WPS ( talk). Self-nominated at 07:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 19:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
19:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Images are appropriately tagged. Sources include an MA thesis, but it's used for an uncontroversial statement and I think is OK; the other sources are reliable. The article is in good shape; I've copyedited a little (please revert if I screwed anything up) and have nothing left over to complain about, so I'm passing this. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 20:14, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
PCN02WPS, I should have done spotchecks when I did the GA review, so I'm doing them now. I came up with one thing I wanted to query:
The other spotchecks I made were all fine. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 10:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)