TALK:WILFORD POWER STATION

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Nottinghamshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

coolant

Was Wilford power station slightly unique in that it did not have cooling towers? -- palmiped | Talk 19:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC) reply

No, it is fairly common for power stations on large bodies of water to not use cooling towers in their cooling systems. Fintan264 ( talk) 19:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC) reply