![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8470962.stm
"Louise Emerson from the Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition office explained that the judging panel had been "reconvened" and had concluded that it was likely that the wolf featured in the image was an animal model that could be "hired for photographic purposes"."
Don't have time to edit the main article myself, but basically the 09 winner is no more the 09 winner due using a trained animal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halfang ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Technical limitations with the Wikipedia software caused problems with this page. As a short-term fix, the flags in one or more tables were removed. A longer term fix may be to split out Wildlife_Photographer_of_the_Year#The_full_list into its own article. See Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Too many templates in one article( permalink to version of 16:02, 31 January 2020(UTC)) for the current discussion. Unfortunately, splitting out the article then transcluding it back in won't solve the problem: If it is split, people will have to visit the new page to see the full list. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 16:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
I support the splitting as the full list makes the article way too long. Only: Does it really make sense to have a list of over 3000 winners in different categories of a competition ( Wikipedia:INDISCRIMINATE)? Even more, it is not even clear what the sources for the list are. I would also support a complete deletion of the list. -- Lynxbiru ( talk) 13:44, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
I have removed now all entries that were 'Highly Commended' or below from the list. -- Lynxbiru ( talk) 10:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8470962.stm
"Louise Emerson from the Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition office explained that the judging panel had been "reconvened" and had concluded that it was likely that the wolf featured in the image was an animal model that could be "hired for photographic purposes"."
Don't have time to edit the main article myself, but basically the 09 winner is no more the 09 winner due using a trained animal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halfang ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Technical limitations with the Wikipedia software caused problems with this page. As a short-term fix, the flags in one or more tables were removed. A longer term fix may be to split out Wildlife_Photographer_of_the_Year#The_full_list into its own article. See Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Too many templates in one article( permalink to version of 16:02, 31 January 2020(UTC)) for the current discussion. Unfortunately, splitting out the article then transcluding it back in won't solve the problem: If it is split, people will have to visit the new page to see the full list. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 16:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
I support the splitting as the full list makes the article way too long. Only: Does it really make sense to have a list of over 3000 winners in different categories of a competition ( Wikipedia:INDISCRIMINATE)? Even more, it is not even clear what the sources for the list are. I would also support a complete deletion of the list. -- Lynxbiru ( talk) 13:44, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
I have removed now all entries that were 'Highly Commended' or below from the list. -- Lynxbiru ( talk) 10:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)