This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmwilli.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
References are missing for this article. I've added the first two. If you use the same format, the numbered footnotes will automatically be added to the reference section. For templates for other kinds of references, see the link on my user page. Thanks! -- Beth Wellington 12:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Wilbur Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The blog Philosophy of Metrics [1] is being used as a source under the Rothschild Investments section. I have some reservations about the reliability of the source. Has anyone else looked at the source? Niteshift36 ( talk) 14:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
It seems that this link has been removed from the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20110714064622/http://lear.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=176 effeiets anders 15:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
It seems like his official portrait has been uploaded at commerce.gov. Is it possible to use this instead? I'm quite new to Wikipedia, so I don't know if this falls under public domain or not. Samhiuy ( talk) 08:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Just a short question: is Wilbur Ross the oldest cabinet member ever confirmed? If so, I think that could be mentioned in the article. Cassandro ( talk) 09:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wilbur Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Tobby72: Per your edit wars here, here and here i have remove the info you add until an agreeement on this can be occurred. Per brd do not restore this till we discuss this or i take you to administrator incident place for edit war on this article and the other ones (2018 china united relations, miao wei and canada china relations). Waskerton ( talk) 07:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
@ Therequiembellishere and Davey2116: Please discuss here and don't edit war about whether we should include Second Gentleman. -- Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 22:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I dare you to find me one good source from a reliable third party that uses this title ANYWHERE. Because it's a total a complete fake notion that you've come up with all on your own. I did so. (1/2)
It. Is. Not. Used. Period., in addition to sounding childish, is categorically false, as I've shown. It's clearly not a fake title, so it's not Wikipedia which is making it real
out of thin air. Besides, it's used for other states as well. Maybe there would be a
grand historical piece on the life and times of New York's "Second Ladies"if it were more prominent, but then again, the Wiki page on Second Lady of the United States isn't based on such a grand historical piece either, just isolated articles about each (recent) individual Second Lady. (2/3)
cannot even fathom how this is a "discussion" at all, you took the words right out of my mouth. The term "Second Lady/Gentleman" is an informal one which refers to the spouse of the VP or lieutenant governor; since Wilbur Ross was this, he had this title. Therefore, by the Wiki precedent that I described above, it should be in the infobox. All of this is really obvious, so I'm not the one who isn't using WP:SENSE. (3/3) Davey2116 ( talk) 18:48, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I can't find any references to a "Second Gentleman" of New York, let alone any specifying that Ross was the "Second Gentleman". Including that title here when no other source does falls under WP:SYNTH. We mention that Ross's wife was Lieutenant-Governor in prose, given there's no evidence that it's a recognised position or office there's no need to go beyond that and include it in the infobox – even if a simple descriptive term like "Spouse of the Lieutenant-Governor" was used. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 15:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
About the Third Opinion request: Third Opinions are only available for disputes between exactly 2 editors. There were more than two before Ivar the Boneful weighed in, so either Ivar's comments constitute the third opinion or no third opinion was available. Either way, your request has been removed from the 3O page. If you wish additional dispute resolution consider a RFC or file at Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 22:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC) (3O Volunteer) (Not watching this page)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmwilli.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
References are missing for this article. I've added the first two. If you use the same format, the numbered footnotes will automatically be added to the reference section. For templates for other kinds of references, see the link on my user page. Thanks! -- Beth Wellington 12:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Wilbur Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The blog Philosophy of Metrics [1] is being used as a source under the Rothschild Investments section. I have some reservations about the reliability of the source. Has anyone else looked at the source? Niteshift36 ( talk) 14:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
It seems that this link has been removed from the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20110714064622/http://lear.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=press_releases&item=176 effeiets anders 15:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
It seems like his official portrait has been uploaded at commerce.gov. Is it possible to use this instead? I'm quite new to Wikipedia, so I don't know if this falls under public domain or not. Samhiuy ( talk) 08:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Just a short question: is Wilbur Ross the oldest cabinet member ever confirmed? If so, I think that could be mentioned in the article. Cassandro ( talk) 09:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wilbur Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Tobby72: Per your edit wars here, here and here i have remove the info you add until an agreeement on this can be occurred. Per brd do not restore this till we discuss this or i take you to administrator incident place for edit war on this article and the other ones (2018 china united relations, miao wei and canada china relations). Waskerton ( talk) 07:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
@ Therequiembellishere and Davey2116: Please discuss here and don't edit war about whether we should include Second Gentleman. -- Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 22:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I dare you to find me one good source from a reliable third party that uses this title ANYWHERE. Because it's a total a complete fake notion that you've come up with all on your own. I did so. (1/2)
It. Is. Not. Used. Period., in addition to sounding childish, is categorically false, as I've shown. It's clearly not a fake title, so it's not Wikipedia which is making it real
out of thin air. Besides, it's used for other states as well. Maybe there would be a
grand historical piece on the life and times of New York's "Second Ladies"if it were more prominent, but then again, the Wiki page on Second Lady of the United States isn't based on such a grand historical piece either, just isolated articles about each (recent) individual Second Lady. (2/3)
cannot even fathom how this is a "discussion" at all, you took the words right out of my mouth. The term "Second Lady/Gentleman" is an informal one which refers to the spouse of the VP or lieutenant governor; since Wilbur Ross was this, he had this title. Therefore, by the Wiki precedent that I described above, it should be in the infobox. All of this is really obvious, so I'm not the one who isn't using WP:SENSE. (3/3) Davey2116 ( talk) 18:48, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I can't find any references to a "Second Gentleman" of New York, let alone any specifying that Ross was the "Second Gentleman". Including that title here when no other source does falls under WP:SYNTH. We mention that Ross's wife was Lieutenant-Governor in prose, given there's no evidence that it's a recognised position or office there's no need to go beyond that and include it in the infobox – even if a simple descriptive term like "Spouse of the Lieutenant-Governor" was used. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 15:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
About the Third Opinion request: Third Opinions are only available for disputes between exactly 2 editors. There were more than two before Ivar the Boneful weighed in, so either Ivar's comments constitute the third opinion or no third opinion was available. Either way, your request has been removed from the 3O page. If you wish additional dispute resolution consider a RFC or file at Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 22:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC) (3O Volunteer) (Not watching this page)