This   level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Weather: Non-tropical Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I removed the line "This is usually experienced by Vermont, New York, Texas and Maine" because I don't really believe it and it was added by some person who made no other contributions. Put it back if there's any reason to. 71.252.43.16 20:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC) reply

This picture shows absolutely nothing.

I put in a new photo. It is not nearly as complete a whiteout as the old one, but it has trees fading into the background for reference, and it shows the characteristic unclear horizon. -- Googleaseerch 02:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC) reply

The article says in substance that it's not a true whiteout if the visibility is greater than 10 m (33 ft), but the Saskatchewan picture clearly has a far greater visibility and is labeled a whiteout. Which is correct? MattF ( talk) 03:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC) reply