GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Mike 2 8 9 17:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
This is the first article I read that actually looks great! I am entering this with no complaints. In my opinion, this should have been nominated for FA Mike 2 8 9 17:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer: Shiftchange ( talk) 01:39, 28 August 2011 (UTC) The lead needs to be expanded to include key facts, see WP:Lead. I would like to know how well it has been received by the public. Has it been popular, are there any criticisms, third party reviews, etc. Other than that it is a nice article, detailed, well sourced, good photos and follows proper formatting. I would fail this nomination until these matters have been attended to.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Mike 2 8 9 17:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
This is the first article I read that actually looks great! I am entering this with no complaints. In my opinion, this should have been nominated for FA Mike 2 8 9 17:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer: Shiftchange ( talk) 01:39, 28 August 2011 (UTC) The lead needs to be expanded to include key facts, see WP:Lead. I would like to know how well it has been received by the public. Has it been popular, are there any criticisms, third party reviews, etc. Other than that it is a nice article, detailed, well sourced, good photos and follows proper formatting. I would fail this nomination until these matters have been attended to.