I was just about to post some relevant information about Westwood High School, and then, to my surprise, I found that the page was protected from editing. "How odd," I thought to myself. "Why would anyone want to stop the free flow of information?"
(Post made by 70.112.174.64, one of the IPs that added false information) WhisperToMe 17:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
WhisperToMe, while I understand your concern about vandalism, it's been protected for nearly a month now, during which time nobody could edit it. I'm unprotecting and will keep a look out for vandalism. -- Tony Sidaway Talk 19:59, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
It seems way too subjective and irrelevant to me. WHy got that information and from where, anyways? 17:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- I don't believe that the remove was absolutely necessary.
- - Mik
Anyone interested in re-attempting the Computer Science section of the article? The last attempt was apparently removed due to the frequent vandalism of it.
--
Mik
18:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Not me, unless we can get someone to watchlist the article (not me, I'm supposed to be on a wikibreak) or semiprotect the article. In addition, it needs to satisfy WP:NOTABLE (although the debate section might strech the rules...) -- science4sail talk con 02:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Should there be a short summary section on some school clubs, or would that be too unnecessary? There seems to be a lot on electives, so why not clubs? - Yellow Panda —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellow Panda ( talk • contribs) 07:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Possible bias with "judge shafting" citation needed for Nishu Mehta. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atosecond ( talk • contribs) 15:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
In order to maintain encyclopedic formatting, exclamation marks will be removed, and I must remind editors, keep an objective viewpoint. 66.68.18.72 ( talk) 04:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I was just about to post some relevant information about Westwood High School, and then, to my surprise, I found that the page was protected from editing. "How odd," I thought to myself. "Why would anyone want to stop the free flow of information?"
(Post made by 70.112.174.64, one of the IPs that added false information) WhisperToMe 17:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
WhisperToMe, while I understand your concern about vandalism, it's been protected for nearly a month now, during which time nobody could edit it. I'm unprotecting and will keep a look out for vandalism. -- Tony Sidaway Talk 19:59, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
It seems way too subjective and irrelevant to me. WHy got that information and from where, anyways? 17:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- I don't believe that the remove was absolutely necessary.
- - Mik
Anyone interested in re-attempting the Computer Science section of the article? The last attempt was apparently removed due to the frequent vandalism of it.
--
Mik
18:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Not me, unless we can get someone to watchlist the article (not me, I'm supposed to be on a wikibreak) or semiprotect the article. In addition, it needs to satisfy WP:NOTABLE (although the debate section might strech the rules...) -- science4sail talk con 02:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Should there be a short summary section on some school clubs, or would that be too unnecessary? There seems to be a lot on electives, so why not clubs? - Yellow Panda —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellow Panda ( talk • contribs) 07:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Possible bias with "judge shafting" citation needed for Nishu Mehta. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atosecond ( talk • contribs) 15:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
In order to maintain encyclopedic formatting, exclamation marks will be removed, and I must remind editors, keep an objective viewpoint. 66.68.18.72 ( talk) 04:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)