This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please merge any relevant content from Westfield North Rocks per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield North Rocks. Thanks. — Quarl ( talk) 2007-02-11 04:35Z
Has to be the longest ever I've seen for a suburb entry. Seems a huge cut and paste that noone would read. I'm going to cut it down severely. Michellecrisp ( talk) 10:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Just because a suburb does have a lot of history, that doesn't mean its a bad thing. If you have no interest in reading it then don't read it. It is all relevent to North Rocks so I've re-instated it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterjmcgrath ( talk • contribs) 06:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Per the copyright violation policy and my discovery of this link, it is clear that the "European settlement" section is a derived work and as such I have removed the infringing content, as Wikipedia has no right to rebroadcast this work. The source does meet our reliable sources guideline in as far as it goes, so editors are free to use and incorporate some elements of the source and cite it as a reference. Orderinchaos 20:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I've updated the location info in the lead, since North Rocks is only partially within the Hills District by most definitions (mostly south of the M2, and partially topographically south of the uplift). It's mildly interesting that the original rocks would have been part of that clear topographical boundary between the higher Hills district and the lower Cumberland plain. As such it's better to state that it lies across these two broad districts. 61.69.197.121 ( talk) 01:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please merge any relevant content from Westfield North Rocks per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield North Rocks. Thanks. — Quarl ( talk) 2007-02-11 04:35Z
Has to be the longest ever I've seen for a suburb entry. Seems a huge cut and paste that noone would read. I'm going to cut it down severely. Michellecrisp ( talk) 10:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Just because a suburb does have a lot of history, that doesn't mean its a bad thing. If you have no interest in reading it then don't read it. It is all relevent to North Rocks so I've re-instated it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterjmcgrath ( talk • contribs) 06:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Per the copyright violation policy and my discovery of this link, it is clear that the "European settlement" section is a derived work and as such I have removed the infringing content, as Wikipedia has no right to rebroadcast this work. The source does meet our reliable sources guideline in as far as it goes, so editors are free to use and incorporate some elements of the source and cite it as a reference. Orderinchaos 20:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I've updated the location info in the lead, since North Rocks is only partially within the Hills District by most definitions (mostly south of the M2, and partially topographically south of the uplift). It's mildly interesting that the original rocks would have been part of that clear topographical boundary between the higher Hills district and the lower Cumberland plain. As such it's better to state that it lies across these two broad districts. 61.69.197.121 ( talk) 01:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)