GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Iazyges ( talk · contribs) 12:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 12:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
GA Criteria
|
---|
GA Criteria:
|
Would you mind if I switch the refs to {{sfn}}? -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
This article mixes references written freehand (i.e., without a template) with one {{ cite book}}. Templates are your friends. Templates are a HUGE help in avoiding errors and inconsistencies, and checking for the same.
To check as many errors as possible in the references and/or notes, I recommend using User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck in conjunction with two other scripts. You can install them as follows:
importScript('User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js');
to
Special:MyPage/common.js .importScript('User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck.js');
. Save that page..citation-comment {display: inline !important;} /* show all Citation Style 1 error messages */
.When you've added all those, go to an article to check for various messages in its notes and references. (You may need to clear your browser's cache first). The output of User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck is not foolproof and can be verbose. Use common sense when interpreting output (especially with respect to sorting errors). Reading the explanatory page will help more than a little. The least urgent message of all is probably Missing archive link; archiving weblinks is good practice but lack of archiving will probably not be mentioned in any content review. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Iazyges ( talk · contribs) 12:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 12:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
GA Criteria
|
---|
GA Criteria:
|
Would you mind if I switch the refs to {{sfn}}? -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
This article mixes references written freehand (i.e., without a template) with one {{ cite book}}. Templates are your friends. Templates are a HUGE help in avoiding errors and inconsistencies, and checking for the same.
To check as many errors as possible in the references and/or notes, I recommend using User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck in conjunction with two other scripts. You can install them as follows:
importScript('User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js');
to
Special:MyPage/common.js .importScript('User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck.js');
. Save that page..citation-comment {display: inline !important;} /* show all Citation Style 1 error messages */
.When you've added all those, go to an article to check for various messages in its notes and references. (You may need to clear your browser's cache first). The output of User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck is not foolproof and can be verbose. Use common sense when interpreting output (especially with respect to sorting errors). Reading the explanatory page will help more than a little. The least urgent message of all is probably Missing archive link; archiving weblinks is good practice but lack of archiving will probably not be mentioned in any content review. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)