This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance Western Eagles FC is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Lukasz.Lewinski16 ( talk) 11:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

 Not done no request and article is not protected

How can I get the Western Eagles FC article protected (semi-protected) ? Lukasz.Lewinski16 ( talk) 21:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Lukasz.Lewinski16 ( talk) 11:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC) reply

You would have to apply at WP:Requests for page protection - but as there has been no obvious vandalism in the last year, let alone ongoing vandalism, this would almost certainly be refused - we do not protect articles pre-emptively - Arjayay ( talk) 11:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC) reply