This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Tasmania / Transport Low‑importance West Coast Wilderness Railway is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Trains Low‑importance Trains Portal DYK 2008-04-30 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article lacks references. It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Ok guys, every new entry gets the treatment fair enough.

Surely, West Coast Wilderness Railway, Tasmania - would

be more appropriate than doing the Australia bit. I cannot understand why the word tourist creeps in. The usual things it was called while it was being rebuilt was the Abt and things like that. User:SatuSuro 7 July 2005 11:42 (UTC)

might look odd temporarily - have mislaid mileage/kilometre list to make sense of this section SatuSuro 10:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC) reply

The article details the re-use of the old engines, but it says: "ABT 2 is currently on display in Hobart in a museum and ABT 2 was scrapped into parts for the other engines." Clearly, one of these references should be to "ABT 4" - but which one is it? Can somebody who knows correct this? Phillip.davis.oz ( talk) 05:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC) reply