This article was nominated for
deletion on 28 February 2022. The result of
the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
I recommend this article for deletion. It appears to be nothing more than promotional piece for this individual, his business and his radio program. Much of the facts listed herein are unverified. In addition, the Washington Post article that supposedly credits Donehue with creating a fake Fred Thompson website actually states that a firm Donehue worked for is believed to have built the site, but does not explicitly state Donehue was the architect.
It would appear that this individual is one of dozens of political consultants in South Carolina and there's little noteworthy about him or his accomplishments. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
74.254.68.126 (
talk)
22:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)reply
I've added a section referencing Donehue's social media controversy, but since that section is literally the only element of the article that has a source, I think it would make more sense to delete the entry entirely.
Gruffbenji (
talk)
20:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)reply
This article was nominated for
deletion on 28 February 2022. The result of
the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
I recommend this article for deletion. It appears to be nothing more than promotional piece for this individual, his business and his radio program. Much of the facts listed herein are unverified. In addition, the Washington Post article that supposedly credits Donehue with creating a fake Fred Thompson website actually states that a firm Donehue worked for is believed to have built the site, but does not explicitly state Donehue was the architect.
It would appear that this individual is one of dozens of political consultants in South Carolina and there's little noteworthy about him or his accomplishments. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
74.254.68.126 (
talk)
22:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)reply
I've added a section referencing Donehue's social media controversy, but since that section is literally the only element of the article that has a source, I think it would make more sense to delete the entry entirely.
Gruffbenji (
talk)
20:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)reply