This isn't really part of the review, but do you think the addition of a picture would be a good idea? Or no?
I'm ambivalent. Not entirely sure it would add much as it's just another old white man in a suit, but if you feel it's sufficiently useful then I could find one.
GRAPPLEX03:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Lede: Maybe add what the critics enjoyed about him
Body: Should "Conceptual History" and "Character arc" be switched to better match the lede, as well as the whole "Fictional History/Production" model that is used a majority of the articles?
Reception: ""It's OK, though. The 'X-Files' gave..." Again, I think it might be best to just italicize to maintain consistency. If this is wrong, then never mind
This isn't really part of the review, but do you think the addition of a picture would be a good idea? Or no?
I'm ambivalent. Not entirely sure it would add much as it's just another old white man in a suit, but if you feel it's sufficiently useful then I could find one.
GRAPPLEX03:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Lede: Maybe add what the critics enjoyed about him
Body: Should "Conceptual History" and "Character arc" be switched to better match the lede, as well as the whole "Fictional History/Production" model that is used a majority of the articles?
Reception: ""It's OK, though. The 'X-Files' gave..." Again, I think it might be best to just italicize to maintain consistency. If this is wrong, then never mind