 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Move to Magnetic domain?
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge this article into Magnetic domain. -- Chetvorno TALK 16:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
I think this article should be renamed to Magnetic domain. It seems to be much more common term Julius Sahara 18:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Magnetic domain is much more common term. Info in WEiss domain should be added to "Magnetic Domain" as to give the origin of discovery.
I disagree, I think It should be called 'The magnetic domain theory'. This is what it is called under the UK General Certificate of Education (A-Level) syllabus for Physics.
- I disagree too, Weiss domains are sometimes used to describe domain structures in piezoelecticity, i.e. in ferroelectric material, but it would be incorrect to call such domains "magnetic domains". -- Nathaniel 11:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Julius, in school I was taught the term "Magnetic Domain".
I find it interesting that Kittel refers to "Weiss molecular field", but not Weiss domain. I agree that we have way too many overlapping articles on this subject. Wikfr ( talk) 02:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with Julius that this article should be merged into
Magnetic domain --
Chetvorno
TALK
16:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Done. -- Chetvorno TALK 16:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Move to Magnetic domain?
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge this article into Magnetic domain. -- Chetvorno TALK 16:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
I think this article should be renamed to Magnetic domain. It seems to be much more common term Julius Sahara 18:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Magnetic domain is much more common term. Info in WEiss domain should be added to "Magnetic Domain" as to give the origin of discovery.
I disagree, I think It should be called 'The magnetic domain theory'. This is what it is called under the UK General Certificate of Education (A-Level) syllabus for Physics.
- I disagree too, Weiss domains are sometimes used to describe domain structures in piezoelecticity, i.e. in ferroelectric material, but it would be incorrect to call such domains "magnetic domains". -- Nathaniel 11:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Julius, in school I was taught the term "Magnetic Domain".
I find it interesting that Kittel refers to "Weiss molecular field", but not Weiss domain. I agree that we have way too many overlapping articles on this subject. Wikfr ( talk) 02:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with Julius that this article should be merged into
Magnetic domain --
Chetvorno
TALK
16:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Done. -- Chetvorno TALK 16:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)