![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I performed a copy-edit of this page. While doing so, I noticed two problems in the "Reception" section:
// Macwhiz ( talk) 19:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Those two-year-old problems are serious. Are they obsolete?
Today I inserted this comment at the head of section Reception (as I improved the 2009 Phoenix Award coverage, which should not be the lead sentence):
This section needs some attention to chronology. Readers should not need the reference publ dates for that. What was the contemporary reception? (beside winning no major annual book award, a negative that is equally true of most books, even most books with Wikipedia articles)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I performed a copy-edit of this page. While doing so, I noticed two problems in the "Reception" section:
// Macwhiz ( talk) 19:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Those two-year-old problems are serious. Are they obsolete?
Today I inserted this comment at the head of section Reception (as I improved the 2009 Phoenix Award coverage, which should not be the lead sentence):
This section needs some attention to chronology. Readers should not need the reference publ dates for that. What was the contemporary reception? (beside winning no major annual book award, a negative that is equally true of most books, even most books with Wikipedia articles)