A fact from Wedding dress of Princess Alexandra of Denmark appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 May 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the
Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the
project page, where you can
join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
One of the important aspects of this dress, and not so far mentioned, is the issue of the lace trim. One of the wedding gifts had been a suite of
Brussels lace for the trousseau. However following the example of Queen Victoria and her "buy British" attitude, this was ignored in favour of new lace from Honiton. Both were of very high quality, but the snubbing of the Brussels lace was something of an insult to its giver and this switch was a politically notable move.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 17:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)reply
A fact from Wedding dress of Princess Alexandra of Denmark appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 May 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the
Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the
project page, where you can
join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
One of the important aspects of this dress, and not so far mentioned, is the issue of the lace trim. One of the wedding gifts had been a suite of
Brussels lace for the trousseau. However following the example of Queen Victoria and her "buy British" attitude, this was ignored in favour of new lace from Honiton. Both were of very high quality, but the snubbing of the Brussels lace was something of an insult to its giver and this switch was a politically notable move.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 17:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)reply