This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the CWEB page were merged into Web (programming system) on 4 July 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
how can acess web??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.53.38 ( talk • contribs) 00:45, 18 June 2008(UTC)
entries/web.html -- SamB ( talk) 00:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Anyone else believe the disambiguation italics at top of article should be simplified to simply WEB? -- Firefly322 ( talk) 23:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Web and CWEB are certainly distinct subjects. However, both articles are very brief and they're very closely related with enough overlap that everyone—Wikipedia editors and readers alike—would probably benefit if both articles were merged into one. Logically, it would make sense that Web be the main article, and CWEB be a "chapter" within, and we can set things up so that people searching for CWEB or visiting the CWEB article are redirected straight there. On the other hand, "Web" is a bit ambiguous, and it might be argued that CWEB is the most notable of the two, in which case we could frame "Web" and its history as essential background info for CWEB, and where our encyclopedia entry lives in an article under the CWEB name. -- C. A. Russell ( talk) 19:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the CWEB page were merged into Web (programming system) on 4 July 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
how can acess web??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.53.38 ( talk • contribs) 00:45, 18 June 2008(UTC)
entries/web.html -- SamB ( talk) 00:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Anyone else believe the disambiguation italics at top of article should be simplified to simply WEB? -- Firefly322 ( talk) 23:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Web and CWEB are certainly distinct subjects. However, both articles are very brief and they're very closely related with enough overlap that everyone—Wikipedia editors and readers alike—would probably benefit if both articles were merged into one. Logically, it would make sense that Web be the main article, and CWEB be a "chapter" within, and we can set things up so that people searching for CWEB or visiting the CWEB article are redirected straight there. On the other hand, "Web" is a bit ambiguous, and it might be argued that CWEB is the most notable of the two, in which case we could frame "Web" and its history as essential background info for CWEB, and where our encyclopedia entry lives in an article under the CWEB name. -- C. A. Russell ( talk) 19:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)