GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Cloudz679 ( talk · contribs) 13:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC) This article was at Good Article Review just a few days ago. The nominator, Royroydeb ( talk · contribs) (RRD), took part in the review, although failed to address the points raised by the reviewer. RRD later claimed not to have had a chance to improve the article during the review. Following the failed review, RRD was informed on their talk page that a new nomination may be appropriate after points from the existing review are dealt with, however the user instead immediately re-nominated. I am therefore closing this GA procedurally, and would like to reaffirm that the action points from the last review, as well as the {{citation needed}} tags on the article must be addressed before a future GA nomination. C 679 13:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Cloudz679 ( talk · contribs) 13:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC) This article was at Good Article Review just a few days ago. The nominator, Royroydeb ( talk · contribs) (RRD), took part in the review, although failed to address the points raised by the reviewer. RRD later claimed not to have had a chance to improve the article during the review. Following the failed review, RRD was informed on their talk page that a new nomination may be appropriate after points from the existing review are dealt with, however the user instead immediately re-nominated. I am therefore closing this GA procedurally, and would like to reaffirm that the action points from the last review, as well as the {{citation needed}} tags on the article must be addressed before a future GA nomination. C 679 13:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)