 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I've proposed deletion of this page as the subject appears to fail the professor test. The only claim to any significance (by Wikipedia's standards) that I can find is this source stating his involvement in a major archeological discovery. But, even that source merely describes the subject as a scholar (below the standards of WP:PROF) whose only involvement was in leading the translation of an ancient text (again, below the standards of WP:PROF). ClaretAsh ( talk) 00:11, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 20 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I've proposed deletion of this page as the subject appears to fail the professor test. The only claim to any significance (by Wikipedia's standards) that I can find is this source stating his involvement in a major archeological discovery. But, even that source merely describes the subject as a scholar (below the standards of WP:PROF) whose only involvement was in leading the translation of an ancient text (again, below the standards of WP:PROF). ClaretAsh ( talk) 00:11, 19 October 2011 (UTC)