![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Is there a way to capitalize the M in Wavemaker?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.28.41.227 ( talk • contribs) 2011-03-16T05:49:27
Large parts of the article read like an overly positive product description from the developers' PoV. For example: feature lists should focus only on the most significant details, they should not aim to provide a comprehensive list of all minor and secondary functionality. Also, as the article focus (atleast the infobox) was changed from software article to company article a while ago, the company history and overview should be the topmost section after the lead, and its content should be converted to neutral prose instead of a list of milestones. The lead should also include a one-sentence introduction of the company. GermanJoe ( talk) 09:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Is there a way to capitalize the M in Wavemaker?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.28.41.227 ( talk • contribs) 2011-03-16T05:49:27
Large parts of the article read like an overly positive product description from the developers' PoV. For example: feature lists should focus only on the most significant details, they should not aim to provide a comprehensive list of all minor and secondary functionality. Also, as the article focus (atleast the infobox) was changed from software article to company article a while ago, the company history and overview should be the topmost section after the lead, and its content should be converted to neutral prose instead of a list of milestones. The lead should also include a one-sentence introduction of the company. GermanJoe ( talk) 09:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)