 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
I have several problems with this articel.
1. I don't think this terms is actually much used. (it isn't in the index of The Road to Reality, forinstance) Particle 'is somewhat ambiguous, but the physics comunity just seems to put up with that.
2. It is completely lacking WP:RS
3. It should arguably be a subsection of complementarity
4. The general tone is kind of amateurish. (Indeed, googling on wavicle tends to being up sites form cranks and laypeople rather than any actual physics papers or professional physicsts homepages)
5. Wavicle links to wave-particle duality. As it should.
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
I have several problems with this articel.
1. I don't think this terms is actually much used. (it isn't in the index of The Road to Reality, forinstance) Particle 'is somewhat ambiguous, but the physics comunity just seems to put up with that.
2. It is completely lacking WP:RS
3. It should arguably be a subsection of complementarity
4. The general tone is kind of amateurish. (Indeed, googling on wavicle tends to being up sites form cranks and laypeople rather than any actual physics papers or professional physicsts homepages)
5. Wavicle links to wave-particle duality. As it should.