This   level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Mid‑importance Talk:Waterfall is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force. Environment Mid‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

As best as I can tell, the researchers section is totally useless/not at all in encyclopedic tone. Does anyone object to deletion? JeanLackE ( talk) 15:58, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello all!

This article has been chosen as this week's effort for WP:Discord's #team-b-vital channel, a collaborate effort to bring Stub and Start class Vital articles up to a B class if possible, similar to WP:Articles for Improvement. This effort will run for up to seven days, ending early if the article is felt to be at B-class or impossible to further improve. Articles are chosen by a quick vote among interested chatters, with the goal of working together on interesting Vital articles that need improving.

Thank you! -- ferret ( talk) 00:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi @ CactiStaccingCrane, while I agree there should just be one image in the lead, I'm not convinced File:RhB ABe 8-12 3510 Bärentritt.jpg is the most representative option, especially because it's a relatively narrow waterfall, and the train cuts right across the middle of the image. It's a good photo, but is it the best for illustrating this article? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Good point. @ Eddie891, what about these pictures?

• File:2012-11-17 10-01-45-cascade-goutte-ullysse.jpg
• more at https://commons.wikimedia.org/?search=Waterfall&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Go&type=image&assessment=any-assessment

CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 14:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Again, it's a good image, but not necessarily the most illustrative. What was the problem with File:Salto del Angel-Canaima-Venezuela08.JPG (in the article previously)? File:Salto del Angel-Canaima-Venezuela19.JPG is probably a better image of the same waterfall There's arguably no better waterfall than Angel Falls to put in the lead. I like File:Cascada Dynjandi, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 136-138 HDR.JPG alternatively, personally. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:38, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply