This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Water Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the first page I have ever created, so I hope I got the syntax right Callachulpa ( talk) 19:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC) reply

There is an issue with this article not having a neutral point of view, because it has an anti-business, pro-government point of view. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 21:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply

I feel it is more about pro-public interest than being anti-business or pro-government. Still the term "grabbing" in the title of course is already politicised but has emerged as a common phrase like "land grabbing" so I felt needed a definition. A more neutral term like "water investment" or "land investment" would get a different stub but would equally need the critique. Still feel free to add, amend or edit to give other perspectives-- User:Callachulpa 12:45, 1 October 2012 (PT)