The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Tim riley ( talk · contribs) 12:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Starting first read-through. This little piece is news to me, and it was a pleasure to hear it (Kuusisto and Turunen) as a preliminary to reviewing the article. More anon. Tim riley talk 12:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't think this is going to take long. The article seems to me to meet all the GA criteria, and these few quibbles are offered for your consideration rather than as diktats:
Over to you. – Tim riley talk 13:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
This will do very well for GA. It meets all the criteria, in my view. It will, I imagine, be unique among musical GAs for the brevity of the piece that it describes, but is none the worse for that. Tim riley talk 18:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Tim riley ( talk · contribs) 12:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Starting first read-through. This little piece is news to me, and it was a pleasure to hear it (Kuusisto and Turunen) as a preliminary to reviewing the article. More anon. Tim riley talk 12:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't think this is going to take long. The article seems to me to meet all the GA criteria, and these few quibbles are offered for your consideration rather than as diktats:
Over to you. – Tim riley talk 13:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
This will do very well for GA. It meets all the criteria, in my view. It will, I imagine, be unique among musical GAs for the brevity of the piece that it describes, but is none the worse for that. Tim riley talk 18:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria