This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
It's worth noting that Ubisoft's word on their twitter was that it would be released on PC and consoles, there is still some speculation about whether the consoles it will be released on, are next gen. 80.0.148.127 (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.148.127 ( talk)
"The game features an elusive online multiplayer element"
is "elusive" the right word here? the answer is "probably not" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superwesman ( talk • contribs) 19:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
ubisoft montreal is the dev. been in development for 2 years. currently only confirmed for ps3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.33.182 ( talk) 23:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I just thought I'd point this out asap. I read in the Gameplay section that:
Which doesn't make much sense. I mean—yes, that's interesting. It still doesn't explain why a protagonist's background details—specifically, ones that are unrelated to the game's gameplay—are in a section that mainly focuses on the Gameplay. This may be obvious, but shouldn't I have read about those things in the Plot and Development sections of the article?
— 017Bluefield ( talk) 05:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I've been working on a wikia, which essentially is a much more expanded version of the article here. I was wondering if it would be of assistance to readers if we added a link on the article to the site; Watch Dogs Wikia. The site itself adheres to all of wikia best practices, and could offer readers who wish to go more in-depth (for things like characters, weapons, gameplay mechanics etc) the opportunity to find out more.
JBanton ( talk) 11:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
I think we should remove it because it feels out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.42.172 ( talk) 04:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I amended the line "The second player must stay within a certain radius of the first player for the download to progress." to "The first player must stay within a certain radius of the second player for the download to progress." As it is in the interest of the First player to stay within the radius of the Second player to continue the hack. The Second will be trying to escape or hunt down the First player - I think it reads better this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.74.187.27 ( talk) 10:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Up until now, I don't think that we've been given a definitive date of when Watch Dogs takes place. I was reading an article on examiner.com, and they noticed something interesting. There's a banner hanging over a road that says The Loop - 125th. This must mean that it's the Chicago Loop's 125th anniversary. The Loop was founded in 1930, so this must mean that the games takes place in 2055. Thoughts? I can't upload the link since Examiner.com is apparently on Wikipedia's blacklist. 173.179.92.34 ( talk) 19:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
The banner is a screenshot from a game trailer (welcome to chicago), so you can provide a link to the trailer and not the article.
Yuyukorin ( talk) 23:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)yuyukorin
This says it's May 27th world-wide. However, I've pre-ordered it: since I live in Asia, apparently I have to wait another month for 'localisation'. If someone would like to confirm that Steam is wrong and I do get the May 27th release, it would be nice. If not... well, the release date on the page is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.25.199.53 ( talk) 13:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
does someone want to add this. http://www.playstation.com/en-us/games/watch-dogs-ps4?CMP=soc_us__gm_psblog_topbanner_3_4_14
No it doesn't it runs at 900p on PS4 and 792p on XBone at 30fps on both consoles. 74.103.250.78 ( talk) 00:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Source http://www.gamespot.com/articles/watch-dogs-runs-at-900p-on-ps4-792p-on-xbox-one/1100-6419607/ 74.103.250.78 ( talk) 00:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
collapsed
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What in God's name is going on with this release chart? It would appear to be classic video game trivia, which is a shame for all the work put into it. If there are highlights from the chart, they can be mentioned in the prose. And for those interested, look at the Twitter response it's getting... czar ♔ 06:53, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
For the record, I removed the chart because of WP:VGSCOPE and the Twitter stuff was just an additional FYI. Also I agree with the above about there being enough reliable coverage to mention how journalists reacted to the number of editions. This said, we haven't and don't include charts with incredible minutiae such as this in our articles. czar ♔ 01:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
References
Do we really need this? The fact that one of the pirated copies circulating contains a virus might be informative, but I don't think it should be placed in the table. Add a sentence or remove completely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.133.8 ( talk) 12:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Watch Dogs has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "Eleven months after his actions led the death of his niece" to "Eleven months after his actions led to the death of his niece" because the preposition 'to' is missing from the original. 79.17.152.175 ( talk) 10:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for pointing that out. - Arjayay ( talk) 10:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
The sentence that begins "And in all this..." does not seem to make sense. 2001:630:53:26:3035:D7FD:D5B0:4A05 ( talk) 15:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
In the article it stats "Free roam multiplayer for 8 players" only for Xbox 360, it will not have free roam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabbitmcv ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Video shown at E3 was most likely run on a PC using an Xbox 360 controller. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.210.158 ( talk) 03:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Can we add a licensed music section to the wiki?
Music in Watch Dogs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.0.35.6 ( talk • contribs) 21:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Seems odd to include such a full synopsis of the plot. Do other works of art (books / movies) have the full plot given away? Adrest4 ( talk) 20:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
The game only uses "CTOS" for the stylized logos - nowhere else in the world. On the other hand, whenever characters talk about it, the subtitles always use "ctOS".
Plus, the code for
{{small|CT}}OS
is like clunky boilerplate code compared to simply using
ctOS
— 017Bluefield ( talk) 20:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Story section has been repeated starting from text: "===Story===" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.115.144.166 ( talk) 08:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Trolling Kotaku I saw that a modder found the graphic files that were in the previews. [1] I'll trust people who've actually been keeping track to find a place for this, or wait to see how the story develops. -- Lenin and McCarthy | ( Complain here) 23:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm not a frequent Wikipedia editor, so I didn't change it myself, but the last couple sentences of the Reception section (under Pre-relase) are very poorly worded and confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.242.79 ( talk) 14:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Should Angryjoe be added as an reviewer? He is generally popular. Heres his review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOISheIuU4k -- Lightspeed2012 05:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Several times in the article, 'IP' is wrongly used to refer to a game-series, even linking to the Intellectual Property article. I'm aware this is common in gaming communities, but does it really belong on Wikipedia?
Wootery ( talk) 20:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
There is a link to Nexus 7 which is a disambig link. The reference to it is a dead link. No clue which version of the tablet this was meant to be. - Galatz ( talk) 23:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: The1337gamer ( talk · contribs) 10:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Reviewing, should be quick...
I'll be away in Hungary, so I won't be able to work on this a lot. I might edit as an IP from time to time. Samtar, this is mostly all on you. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 10:25, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
I could spend hours writing a more thorough review, but there is no need. It qualifies for immediate failure due to being incomplete, the presence of valid cleanup banners, and failing the first three GA criteria. I would say it is still a C-class article currently. -- The1337gamer ( talk) 10:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
valid cleanup bannerssomewhat disingenuous - adding them before accepting the GA review, then citing them as a quick fail rationale just doesn't sit well with me. I can't fault you on your other valid points, and would like to thank you again for a speedy review -- samtar talk or stalk 15:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Shouldn’t the title and mentions of the name of the game be changed from “Watch Dogs” to “Watch_Dogs”?
The game is titled “Watch_Dogs™” on
Steam.
―
PapíDimmi (
talk |
contribs) 01:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm not that much of a gamer and i never played this game. But i recently came across a review of watch dogs 2 and it started with a bit on Ubisoft making a sequel despite the controversy about the graphics in watch dogs 1. That's also all i know the game for as a layman. I've seen or heard it referred to in several discussions on why you shouldn't pre-order games. I think the graphics controversy should be mentioned in the lead. PizzaMan ( ♨♨) 06:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
On steam, 35% of those who bought the game gave it a negative review. This means its review score is "mixed". I feel the professional reviews and the sales only tell part of the story. The people who bought the game based on the positive professional reviews were apparently often disappointed. PizzaMan ( ♨♨) 21:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Should Peter Connelly be added in the infobox or not?
Inviting User:Lordtobi to the discussion.
-- TudorTulok ( talk) 17:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TheSandDoctor ( talk · contribs) 18:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I will pick up this review in a day or so. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 18:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
This section is short (only 4 sentences), but I am not sure how it could be expanded. Maybe it should be combined with another section? I am willing to give it a "pass" on this though. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 19:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
This section seems short, but there isn't much to say really as most of it is covered in Watch Dogs 2's article. Overall, while short I think it is okay given the lack of information available. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 19:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Cognissonance: If you have any questions please feel free to let me know. I have completed my anaylsis of the sections and left my points above. Until they are addressed, I am placing this On hold. My overall opinion of this article is that it is decent enough for the GA classification, it just has some minor tweaks that need to be done. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 19:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
I am now satisfied that the article now meets the requirements to be listed as a Video games good article. I extend my congratulations to the nominator, Cognissonance, and all other editors who have constructively worked on this article. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
It's worth noting that Ubisoft's word on their twitter was that it would be released on PC and consoles, there is still some speculation about whether the consoles it will be released on, are next gen. 80.0.148.127 (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.148.127 ( talk)
"The game features an elusive online multiplayer element"
is "elusive" the right word here? the answer is "probably not" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superwesman ( talk • contribs) 19:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
ubisoft montreal is the dev. been in development for 2 years. currently only confirmed for ps3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.33.182 ( talk) 23:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I just thought I'd point this out asap. I read in the Gameplay section that:
Which doesn't make much sense. I mean—yes, that's interesting. It still doesn't explain why a protagonist's background details—specifically, ones that are unrelated to the game's gameplay—are in a section that mainly focuses on the Gameplay. This may be obvious, but shouldn't I have read about those things in the Plot and Development sections of the article?
— 017Bluefield ( talk) 05:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I've been working on a wikia, which essentially is a much more expanded version of the article here. I was wondering if it would be of assistance to readers if we added a link on the article to the site; Watch Dogs Wikia. The site itself adheres to all of wikia best practices, and could offer readers who wish to go more in-depth (for things like characters, weapons, gameplay mechanics etc) the opportunity to find out more.
JBanton ( talk) 11:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
I think we should remove it because it feels out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.42.172 ( talk) 04:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I amended the line "The second player must stay within a certain radius of the first player for the download to progress." to "The first player must stay within a certain radius of the second player for the download to progress." As it is in the interest of the First player to stay within the radius of the Second player to continue the hack. The Second will be trying to escape or hunt down the First player - I think it reads better this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.74.187.27 ( talk) 10:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Up until now, I don't think that we've been given a definitive date of when Watch Dogs takes place. I was reading an article on examiner.com, and they noticed something interesting. There's a banner hanging over a road that says The Loop - 125th. This must mean that it's the Chicago Loop's 125th anniversary. The Loop was founded in 1930, so this must mean that the games takes place in 2055. Thoughts? I can't upload the link since Examiner.com is apparently on Wikipedia's blacklist. 173.179.92.34 ( talk) 19:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
The banner is a screenshot from a game trailer (welcome to chicago), so you can provide a link to the trailer and not the article.
Yuyukorin ( talk) 23:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)yuyukorin
This says it's May 27th world-wide. However, I've pre-ordered it: since I live in Asia, apparently I have to wait another month for 'localisation'. If someone would like to confirm that Steam is wrong and I do get the May 27th release, it would be nice. If not... well, the release date on the page is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.25.199.53 ( talk) 13:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
does someone want to add this. http://www.playstation.com/en-us/games/watch-dogs-ps4?CMP=soc_us__gm_psblog_topbanner_3_4_14
No it doesn't it runs at 900p on PS4 and 792p on XBone at 30fps on both consoles. 74.103.250.78 ( talk) 00:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Source http://www.gamespot.com/articles/watch-dogs-runs-at-900p-on-ps4-792p-on-xbox-one/1100-6419607/ 74.103.250.78 ( talk) 00:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
collapsed
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What in God's name is going on with this release chart? It would appear to be classic video game trivia, which is a shame for all the work put into it. If there are highlights from the chart, they can be mentioned in the prose. And for those interested, look at the Twitter response it's getting... czar ♔ 06:53, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
For the record, I removed the chart because of WP:VGSCOPE and the Twitter stuff was just an additional FYI. Also I agree with the above about there being enough reliable coverage to mention how journalists reacted to the number of editions. This said, we haven't and don't include charts with incredible minutiae such as this in our articles. czar ♔ 01:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
References
Do we really need this? The fact that one of the pirated copies circulating contains a virus might be informative, but I don't think it should be placed in the table. Add a sentence or remove completely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.133.8 ( talk) 12:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Watch Dogs has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "Eleven months after his actions led the death of his niece" to "Eleven months after his actions led to the death of his niece" because the preposition 'to' is missing from the original. 79.17.152.175 ( talk) 10:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for pointing that out. - Arjayay ( talk) 10:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
The sentence that begins "And in all this..." does not seem to make sense. 2001:630:53:26:3035:D7FD:D5B0:4A05 ( talk) 15:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
In the article it stats "Free roam multiplayer for 8 players" only for Xbox 360, it will not have free roam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabbitmcv ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Video shown at E3 was most likely run on a PC using an Xbox 360 controller. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.210.158 ( talk) 03:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Can we add a licensed music section to the wiki?
Music in Watch Dogs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.0.35.6 ( talk • contribs) 21:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Seems odd to include such a full synopsis of the plot. Do other works of art (books / movies) have the full plot given away? Adrest4 ( talk) 20:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
The game only uses "CTOS" for the stylized logos - nowhere else in the world. On the other hand, whenever characters talk about it, the subtitles always use "ctOS".
Plus, the code for
{{small|CT}}OS
is like clunky boilerplate code compared to simply using
ctOS
— 017Bluefield ( talk) 20:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Story section has been repeated starting from text: "===Story===" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.115.144.166 ( talk) 08:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Trolling Kotaku I saw that a modder found the graphic files that were in the previews. [1] I'll trust people who've actually been keeping track to find a place for this, or wait to see how the story develops. -- Lenin and McCarthy | ( Complain here) 23:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm not a frequent Wikipedia editor, so I didn't change it myself, but the last couple sentences of the Reception section (under Pre-relase) are very poorly worded and confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.242.79 ( talk) 14:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Should Angryjoe be added as an reviewer? He is generally popular. Heres his review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOISheIuU4k -- Lightspeed2012 05:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Several times in the article, 'IP' is wrongly used to refer to a game-series, even linking to the Intellectual Property article. I'm aware this is common in gaming communities, but does it really belong on Wikipedia?
Wootery ( talk) 20:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
There is a link to Nexus 7 which is a disambig link. The reference to it is a dead link. No clue which version of the tablet this was meant to be. - Galatz ( talk) 23:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: The1337gamer ( talk · contribs) 10:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Reviewing, should be quick...
I'll be away in Hungary, so I won't be able to work on this a lot. I might edit as an IP from time to time. Samtar, this is mostly all on you. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 10:25, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
I could spend hours writing a more thorough review, but there is no need. It qualifies for immediate failure due to being incomplete, the presence of valid cleanup banners, and failing the first three GA criteria. I would say it is still a C-class article currently. -- The1337gamer ( talk) 10:58, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
valid cleanup bannerssomewhat disingenuous - adding them before accepting the GA review, then citing them as a quick fail rationale just doesn't sit well with me. I can't fault you on your other valid points, and would like to thank you again for a speedy review -- samtar talk or stalk 15:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Shouldn’t the title and mentions of the name of the game be changed from “Watch Dogs” to “Watch_Dogs”?
The game is titled “Watch_Dogs™” on
Steam.
―
PapíDimmi (
talk |
contribs) 01:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm not that much of a gamer and i never played this game. But i recently came across a review of watch dogs 2 and it started with a bit on Ubisoft making a sequel despite the controversy about the graphics in watch dogs 1. That's also all i know the game for as a layman. I've seen or heard it referred to in several discussions on why you shouldn't pre-order games. I think the graphics controversy should be mentioned in the lead. PizzaMan ( ♨♨) 06:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
On steam, 35% of those who bought the game gave it a negative review. This means its review score is "mixed". I feel the professional reviews and the sales only tell part of the story. The people who bought the game based on the positive professional reviews were apparently often disappointed. PizzaMan ( ♨♨) 21:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Should Peter Connelly be added in the infobox or not?
Inviting User:Lordtobi to the discussion.
-- TudorTulok ( talk) 17:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TheSandDoctor ( talk · contribs) 18:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I will pick up this review in a day or so. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 18:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
This section is short (only 4 sentences), but I am not sure how it could be expanded. Maybe it should be combined with another section? I am willing to give it a "pass" on this though. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 19:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
This section seems short, but there isn't much to say really as most of it is covered in Watch Dogs 2's article. Overall, while short I think it is okay given the lack of information available. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 19:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Cognissonance: If you have any questions please feel free to let me know. I have completed my anaylsis of the sections and left my points above. Until they are addressed, I am placing this On hold. My overall opinion of this article is that it is decent enough for the GA classification, it just has some minor tweaks that need to be done. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 19:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
I am now satisfied that the article now meets the requirements to be listed as a Video games good article. I extend my congratulations to the nominator, Cognissonance, and all other editors who have constructively worked on this article. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)