From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Steelkamp ( talk · contribs) 10:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply


Hello. I will be doing a good article review of this article. I aim to complete this review within the next few days. It should be pretty close to GA level judging from my initial glance over it. If you would like to repay the favour, I have some good article nominations at WP:GAN right now. Steelkamp ( talk) 10:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Good article criteria

Well written

Verifiable with no original research

  • I checked every reference that I could access (all but the first one), and they seem to be reliable. The article also conforms with what they say. I will have to assume good faith on the one I could not access. This criterion is passed. Good job, I don't think I've ever done a GA review where I don't have any suggestions for sourcing. Steelkamp ( talk) 05:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Broad in its coverage

Neutral

Stable

Illustrated, if possible

General

I've done all my suggestions for criteria 1 and 3. I have yet to look at sources. Steelkamp ( talk) 16:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Steelkamp ( talk · contribs) 10:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply


Hello. I will be doing a good article review of this article. I aim to complete this review within the next few days. It should be pretty close to GA level judging from my initial glance over it. If you would like to repay the favour, I have some good article nominations at WP:GAN right now. Steelkamp ( talk) 10:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Good article criteria

Well written

Verifiable with no original research

  • I checked every reference that I could access (all but the first one), and they seem to be reliable. The article also conforms with what they say. I will have to assume good faith on the one I could not access. This criterion is passed. Good job, I don't think I've ever done a GA review where I don't have any suggestions for sourcing. Steelkamp ( talk) 05:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Broad in its coverage

Neutral

Stable

Illustrated, if possible

General

I've done all my suggestions for criteria 1 and 3. I have yet to look at sources. Steelkamp ( talk) 16:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook