This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I disagree with the proposed merger however I propose
Many readers will be primarily interested in one issue or the other: either the geological feature, or visiting the park. The national park provides recreational facilities and a protected area of natural habitats with the centrepiece (the reason the park was created) being the geological feature. But many bushwalkers aren't into geology and many geologists only walk through the bush in order to reach an interesting rock outcrop. Ga rr ie 01:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
This merge was proposed over a month ago. A concesus of Do Not Merge has been reached (there have been no arguements raised promoting the merger and a sound case proposed for continuing with two seperate articles). I am removing the template from both pages. Ga rr ie 21:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
—
Given the existence of Warrumbungle National Park it would make most sense if this article continues to provide information regarding the geological feature, rather than topics such as the walks, wildlife and facilities, which are more associated with the National Park rather than the feature/outcrop/remnant itself (sorry, I'm not a geologist. It's just a big rock to me ;) ) Ga rr ie
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I disagree with the proposed merger however I propose
Many readers will be primarily interested in one issue or the other: either the geological feature, or visiting the park. The national park provides recreational facilities and a protected area of natural habitats with the centrepiece (the reason the park was created) being the geological feature. But many bushwalkers aren't into geology and many geologists only walk through the bush in order to reach an interesting rock outcrop. Ga rr ie 01:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
This merge was proposed over a month ago. A concesus of Do Not Merge has been reached (there have been no arguements raised promoting the merger and a sound case proposed for continuing with two seperate articles). I am removing the template from both pages. Ga rr ie 21:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
—
Given the existence of Warrumbungle National Park it would make most sense if this article continues to provide information regarding the geological feature, rather than topics such as the walks, wildlife and facilities, which are more associated with the National Park rather than the feature/outcrop/remnant itself (sorry, I'm not a geologist. It's just a big rock to me ;) ) Ga rr ie