![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I will soon add a section about the retirement of the class as main combatants and the later conversion of three boats to OPV configuration. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 08:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
The main points as I know them:
Some help finding sources would be appreciated. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 08:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
References
I have removed the photo of a Chilean Navy Sa'ar 4 from the page. There are significant visible differences between it and the SA version, not least of which are the colour - the SAN used/uses a lighter grey - and the large Chilean ensign clearly visible in the photo. I will contact a few acquaintances who may have proper photos that they might be willing to donate. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 11:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
There are two references in shortened footnote format - "Du Toit 1992" and "Bennett 2008" which are incomplete. When shortened footnotes are used inline the References section must contain the full bibliographic reference - they are missing. I have been able to replace one instance with a different source but the Du Toit source is cited seven times and the Bennett three times. Please see Template:Sfn for guidance on how to fix the problem - or alternatively replace them with {{ cite book}} references. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 12:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Since all active Warrior class ships are now used as offshore patrol vessels, should the article be renamed to Warrior-class Offshore Patrol Vessel instead of a Warrior-class strike craft, or should it be left as is? DanieB52 ( talk) 19:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I will soon add a section about the retirement of the class as main combatants and the later conversion of three boats to OPV configuration. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 08:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
The main points as I know them:
Some help finding sources would be appreciated. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 08:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
References
I have removed the photo of a Chilean Navy Sa'ar 4 from the page. There are significant visible differences between it and the SA version, not least of which are the colour - the SAN used/uses a lighter grey - and the large Chilean ensign clearly visible in the photo. I will contact a few acquaintances who may have proper photos that they might be willing to donate. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 11:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
There are two references in shortened footnote format - "Du Toit 1992" and "Bennett 2008" which are incomplete. When shortened footnotes are used inline the References section must contain the full bibliographic reference - they are missing. I have been able to replace one instance with a different source but the Du Toit source is cited seven times and the Bennett three times. Please see Template:Sfn for guidance on how to fix the problem - or alternatively replace them with {{ cite book}} references. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 12:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Since all active Warrior class ships are now used as offshore patrol vessels, should the article be renamed to Warrior-class Offshore Patrol Vessel instead of a Warrior-class strike craft, or should it be left as is? DanieB52 ( talk) 19:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)