This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indonesia and
Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Can a source be cited for the title, "War of the League of the Indies"?
Srnec (
talk) 17:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Removing sources
Hello @
Javext, we are not using Primary sources for articles, especially for history related ones. And could you elaborate by meaning "analysed by secondary sources"?
Imperial[AFCND] 16:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I believe there is only 1 source that could be classified as primary which is:
- Lemos, Jorge de (1585). História dos
Cercos de Malaca &. Lisbon: Biblioteca
Nacional.
(Perhaps this one too but I am not sure; Pereira, António Pinto 1617. História da Índia, ao Tempo Que a Governou o Vice-Rei D. Luiz de Ataíde I 1986 reprint ed. Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.)
But you removed more. What I meant was that the secondary sources provided analyze the primary sources regarding this conflict.
@
Wareno Since you are the creator of this article, could you please check this and provide us with more information?
Javext (
talk) 19:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Yep that would be better. Some of the sources fall under
WP: AGEMATTERS. That was one of the reasons for the removal of those sources, as I gave in edit summary. Especially in Indian history where
WP:RAJ is present, we are using modern sources to cite history.
Imperial[AFCND] 04:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Javext would you mind if I revert to my version? Or atleast cite the content in the infobox.
WP:CALC would work, but consider using modern sources. I hope we all are aware about the exaggerations of Primary sources.
Imperial[AFCND] 10:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
ImperialAficionado Hello, I did not see this message in my notification box, I apologize.
So, could you explain how all the sources you removed besides "Lemos, Jorge de (1585). História dos
Cercos de Malaca &. Lisbon: Biblioteca Nacional." are classified as Primary? Thanks
Javext (
talk) 20:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Javext hello. Almost all the sources, not from the last century falls under
WP:RAJ,
WP: AGEMATTERS and would not be considered as reliable for citing historic narratives. It would be constructive if we provide newer sources.
Imperial[AFCND] 19:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Removed the unsourced parts. Feel free to restore with sourced information
Imperial[AFCND] 15:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indonesia and
Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Can a source be cited for the title, "War of the League of the Indies"?
Srnec (
talk) 17:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Removing sources
Hello @
Javext, we are not using Primary sources for articles, especially for history related ones. And could you elaborate by meaning "analysed by secondary sources"?
Imperial[AFCND] 16:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I believe there is only 1 source that could be classified as primary which is:
- Lemos, Jorge de (1585). História dos
Cercos de Malaca &. Lisbon: Biblioteca
Nacional.
(Perhaps this one too but I am not sure; Pereira, António Pinto 1617. História da Índia, ao Tempo Que a Governou o Vice-Rei D. Luiz de Ataíde I 1986 reprint ed. Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.)
But you removed more. What I meant was that the secondary sources provided analyze the primary sources regarding this conflict.
@
Wareno Since you are the creator of this article, could you please check this and provide us with more information?
Javext (
talk) 19:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Yep that would be better. Some of the sources fall under
WP: AGEMATTERS. That was one of the reasons for the removal of those sources, as I gave in edit summary. Especially in Indian history where
WP:RAJ is present, we are using modern sources to cite history.
Imperial[AFCND] 04:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Javext would you mind if I revert to my version? Or atleast cite the content in the infobox.
WP:CALC would work, but consider using modern sources. I hope we all are aware about the exaggerations of Primary sources.
Imperial[AFCND] 10:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
ImperialAficionado Hello, I did not see this message in my notification box, I apologize.
So, could you explain how all the sources you removed besides "Lemos, Jorge de (1585). História dos
Cercos de Malaca &. Lisbon: Biblioteca Nacional." are classified as Primary? Thanks
Javext (
talk) 20:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Javext hello. Almost all the sources, not from the last century falls under
WP:RAJ,
WP: AGEMATTERS and would not be considered as reliable for citing historic narratives. It would be constructive if we provide newer sources.
Imperial[AFCND] 19:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Removed the unsourced parts. Feel free to restore with sourced information
Imperial[AFCND] 15:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply