From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Multiple Versions of the text

There are two differing versions available online, the archive.org one is longer with more chapters, the other republished in 1950 appears to be edited but i've not properly compared the two- any thoughts on the best way to talk about this? AnimumIgnatius ( talk) 18:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Does this article meet the requirements of WP:Notability (books)?

Please take a look at the above guideline. I am not saying the book is not notable... but as the article currently stands it does not substantiate its notability in accordance with the guideline. Blueboar ( talk) 00:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC) reply

-I intend to expand the article especially the section on legacy to show it is notable, also add some information on papal endorsement. AnimumIgnatius ( talk) 18:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC) reply

I believe it is notable enough. Zezen ( talk) 15:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Low quality. Poorly written. Many errors in grammar, punctuation, and markup. Lacks sources for most assertions. Probably a pastiche of library notes. 76.167.85.97 ( talk) 23:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Multiple Versions of the text

There are two differing versions available online, the archive.org one is longer with more chapters, the other republished in 1950 appears to be edited but i've not properly compared the two- any thoughts on the best way to talk about this? AnimumIgnatius ( talk) 18:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Does this article meet the requirements of WP:Notability (books)?

Please take a look at the above guideline. I am not saying the book is not notable... but as the article currently stands it does not substantiate its notability in accordance with the guideline. Blueboar ( talk) 00:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC) reply

-I intend to expand the article especially the section on legacy to show it is notable, also add some information on papal endorsement. AnimumIgnatius ( talk) 18:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC) reply

I believe it is notable enough. Zezen ( talk) 15:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Low quality. Poorly written. Many errors in grammar, punctuation, and markup. Lacks sources for most assertions. Probably a pastiche of library notes. 76.167.85.97 ( talk) 23:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook