![]() | Walton and Ivythorn Hills has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Walton and Ivythorn Hills is part of the National Trust properties in Somerset series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
I'll finish this soon
JAG
UAR
22:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This is a nice and well referenced article.
Admittedly a very short review, but they were all of the issues I could find with it. The article is compact, well written and well-researched, so there were little points to make. If all of the above can be addressed then this should have no problem passing.
JAG
UAR
18:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | Walton and Ivythorn Hills has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Walton and Ivythorn Hills is part of the National Trust properties in Somerset series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
I'll finish this soon
JAG
UAR
22:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This is a nice and well referenced article.
Admittedly a very short review, but they were all of the issues I could find with it. The article is compact, well written and well-researched, so there were little points to make. If all of the above can be addressed then this should have no problem passing.
JAG
UAR
18:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)