This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Walter Smith article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A news item involving Walter Smith was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 27 October 2021. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I spent 30 minutes translating this bloody article into French Wikipedia, but lost it all due to some computer shit thang.-- Dangherous 17:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Why has someone set Walter Smith as the current manager of Rangers? As of 12.20pm on the 5/1/07 even the Rangers Website havent announced that! Anyway, it will be unlikely that Smith will be the day-to-day manger due to his commitments to Scotland.
Walter will be the next manager believe you me and he will bring the good times back to Ibrox just as he has with Scotland. The pull of going back to his spiritual home is just too strong to ignore for him.
I added a short line just to report on the press speculation, can be updated pretty soon I bet - Niall McG.
Surely we can accept BBC sport as being a good enough source so that we can state he is the new Rangers manager?
Looks like he isnt now, Scotland have rebuffed the Approach?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/r/rangers/6233237.stm
BBC Sport reporting that they 'understand' something is not the same as it being true. They are guessing as much as anyone else.
Seems unencylcopedic to say this. It seems like opinion. Besides a 6-0 win is better than a 5-0 win so how can 5-0 be the "Best Possible Start"? How about "very convincing" or "very positive", either way "Best" needs to go.
I changed the sentence to be more encylcopedic, however it has been reverted. The origonal was POV.
The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page to the plain title, per the discussion below. A different parenthetical might be better, and if necessary, action can be taken to move the page to any unblocked target. Dekimasu よ! 03:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Walter Smith seems to me to be a more suitable title, as he isn't well known as a footballer. Template:Otherpeople can be used to point to the disambig page. WATP ( talk) • ( contribs) 19:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv ( talk) 10:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Walter Smith (footballer) → Walter Smith — No need for disambiguation - this is by far the best known Walter Smith. Almost all of the people listed at the present disambiguation page have qualifying middle names. The only other person with Walter Smith (something) is a relatively little known English footballer. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 15:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Walter Smith. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Walter Smith article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A news item involving Walter Smith was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 27 October 2021. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
I spent 30 minutes translating this bloody article into French Wikipedia, but lost it all due to some computer shit thang.-- Dangherous 17:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Why has someone set Walter Smith as the current manager of Rangers? As of 12.20pm on the 5/1/07 even the Rangers Website havent announced that! Anyway, it will be unlikely that Smith will be the day-to-day manger due to his commitments to Scotland.
Walter will be the next manager believe you me and he will bring the good times back to Ibrox just as he has with Scotland. The pull of going back to his spiritual home is just too strong to ignore for him.
I added a short line just to report on the press speculation, can be updated pretty soon I bet - Niall McG.
Surely we can accept BBC sport as being a good enough source so that we can state he is the new Rangers manager?
Looks like he isnt now, Scotland have rebuffed the Approach?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/r/rangers/6233237.stm
BBC Sport reporting that they 'understand' something is not the same as it being true. They are guessing as much as anyone else.
Seems unencylcopedic to say this. It seems like opinion. Besides a 6-0 win is better than a 5-0 win so how can 5-0 be the "Best Possible Start"? How about "very convincing" or "very positive", either way "Best" needs to go.
I changed the sentence to be more encylcopedic, however it has been reverted. The origonal was POV.
The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page to the plain title, per the discussion below. A different parenthetical might be better, and if necessary, action can be taken to move the page to any unblocked target. Dekimasu よ! 03:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Walter Smith seems to me to be a more suitable title, as he isn't well known as a footballer. Template:Otherpeople can be used to point to the disambig page. WATP ( talk) • ( contribs) 19:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv ( talk) 10:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Walter Smith (footballer) → Walter Smith — No need for disambiguation - this is by far the best known Walter Smith. Almost all of the people listed at the present disambiguation page have qualifying middle names. The only other person with Walter Smith (something) is a relatively little known English footballer. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 15:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Walter Smith. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)