This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-10-24. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a long time Wikipedian, I find the existence of this article in its current form deeply disturbing. It is patently obvious that this guy was engaging in pseudoscience (there is no plausible scientific basis for his claimed discoveries). However, this article is written in a way that appears to give it legitimacy and is fueling conspiracy theories regarding "dicyanin" online. Alsosaid1987 ( talk) 06:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Would anyone like to work with me on expanding this article? Royalhistorian ( talk) 10:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Kilner_jar mentions WJK as the inventor of the Kilner jar. If true, it seems like it might be worth referring to here.-- Wcoole ( talk) 22:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-10-24. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a long time Wikipedian, I find the existence of this article in its current form deeply disturbing. It is patently obvious that this guy was engaging in pseudoscience (there is no plausible scientific basis for his claimed discoveries). However, this article is written in a way that appears to give it legitimacy and is fueling conspiracy theories regarding "dicyanin" online. Alsosaid1987 ( talk) 06:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Would anyone like to work with me on expanding this article? Royalhistorian ( talk) 10:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Kilner_jar mentions WJK as the inventor of the Kilner jar. If true, it seems like it might be worth referring to here.-- Wcoole ( talk) 22:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)